CileTheSane

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yup.

YouTube could easily avoid AdBlockers by simply having ad part of the video itself. Not pulling it from a different server, not hijacking your video player to prevent user controls, just part of the video like any other part of the video and AdBlockers would not be able to detect it. They're not going to do that though, because then users won't be forced to watch an ad they have no interest in.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (9 children)

They are still using it and costing YouTube money in aggregate

The poor company only making $31.5 Billion a year has to eat the streaming cost for someone using as ad blocker? Won't somebody PLEASE think of the billionaires?!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (6 children)

But it's quite horrifying to see people around the world having been taught into thinking that everything should be "free"

Maybe the businesses shouldn't have created the expectation that everything was "free" then.

YouTube used to be 1 skippable ad at the start of the video. Now it's multiple unskippable ads throughout the video. If the 1 skippable ad wasn't a viable business model then they shouldn't have been pretending it was and then changing things later once people have gotten used to the "free" system.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (11 children)

That's exactly what people are doing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Yup, it would be so easy to do it in a way that is difficult for ad blockers to remove and doesn't annoy the fuck out of the users, but it would allow users to manually skip them so they're not going to do it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Anything that causes the video player to behave differently during the ad is a clear marker to ad blockers that "THERE IS AN AD HERE!"

The hardest thing to block would be just making the ad a direct part of the video, which behaves like the rest of the video. This would reduce the effectiveness of ad blockers filtering it out significantly, but then users would be able to skip ads they don't want to watch and we can't have that...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (4 children)

The simplest solution is to embed the ads in the video stream.

Then people could fast forward past them.
I'd be fine with it, but advertisers won't be happy until you're forced to stand up, say "Mc Donald's", and then answer a short quiz about the ad that just played before you can continue.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Advertisers, Malwares and Ad blockers are all to blame for the current state of the internet.

So the thing that blocks the first two is equally to blame?

I remember the day I started using an Ad blocker. I used to not care at all about ads on sites, "it's how they make money. I can live with it." And then I encountered a banner ad that screamed "HELOOOOOOO!" every time my mouse went over it. I couldn't download an ad blocker fast enough.

Advertisers and Malware are to blame for Ad blockers. Advertisers will get more and more annoying and intrusive until people reach the point that they won't put up with them anymore. Seeing as the internet is one big bucket and I can't block some ads, then I will block all ads.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (4 children)

"I haven't read it, but I assume these are things they didn't take into account."

Okay then.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

These people are like flat earthers. Every time something doesn't agree with them it must be a problem with the technology.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago

You are unbiased (as long as you are confirming my biases)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Or plan in advance and have some protection?

view more: ‹ prev next ›