BluJay320

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Uhh, that would be the chupacabra, sir

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You mean like the shoe company?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Stop making up words

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Infectious substance, explosive, harmful irritant

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Nah but see, that directly supports the creator making the content you’re watching.. It’s annoying, yes, but at least you can skip over it immediately instead of having forced ads shoved in your face so Google can make an extra buck

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

High powered laser pointer time

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Listen, I hate this country as well, but you just sound like an actual child

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

I’d be upset to realize I raised an idiot, yes

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I don’t think there’s really any “changing” going on. The state of both entangled particles are unknown until one is measured, but I highly doubt that the act of measuring one suddenly determines the other’s state. They were already in those states, but before measurement it was an unknown variable which could be treated as a superposition. Once one is measured, then you know the state of the other entangled particle. Not because the act of measuring one affects the other (see: spooky action), but simply because the nature of entangled particles means the other would have to have to be the opposite of what you measured.

There’s no remote interaction, it’s simply mutual information

At least, that’s my take

Edit: this is why we can’t use entanglement for FTL communication. It just doesn’t work like that

Edit 2: seems my understanding was way off, but I’m leaving this comment up for the sake of context for the replies.. Thanks to the people that responded for trying to clear things up. Quantum physics is weird.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

No spooky action at a distance

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

TWO Big Macs

view more: ‹ prev next ›