Aesthesiaphilia

The carbon tax is supposed to (partially) go towards credits for EVs

All the IPCC models assume massive amounts of sequestration, I believe

It's a necessity at this point, even if all fossil fuel use stops globally tomorrow

If the overall goal is to increase the human population, it actually makes total sense

If the goal is to prevent murders, then no, it doesn't make sense

There's plenty of EVs with 300+ miles of range now. Shouldn't be an issue.

carbon sequestration is not ever going to work

I don't know what you're talking about, it's a thing that is currently being done. Not some future hypothetical tech.

But yes it is too expensive for now. Costs are coming down hopefully that continues to be the case.

And yes, the best, cheapest, most efficient way to reduce ghg is to eliminate fossil fuels.

Instead of offsets, companies should be pursuing direct carbon sequestration like with https://climeworks.com/

No estimates, no accounting magic. Just a direct measure of physical, measurable tons of carbon directly removed from the atmosphere.

Surveillance state.

This post is Jessica's revenge on the sighted

As per my previous message

lol

cope

more

Lol cope more

Communism killed itself, which is good because it has an almost 100% track record of turning into dictatorship.

(Capitalism is working on killing itself but hasn't quite finished the job yet)

I always try to remember this. SOMEONE is an absolute idiot in situations like this, but it's not always the most obvious one.

Also: someone going super slow in the fast lane. It's not always the car in front of you, especially if it's a big car. Sometimes there's a little car in front of em.

That's why it's so juicy, they're all such terrible people we don't have to pick sides