this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
107 points (88.5% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3463 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google warns it will delete millions of Gmail accounts in December::Google has confirmed that accounts will start being deleted next month unless users follow some simple advice.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 225 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Save you a click:

“If a Google Account has not been used or signed into for at least 2 years, we may delete the account and its contents – including content within Google Workspace (Gmail, Docs, Drive, Meet, Calendar) and Google Photos.”

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

thank you for your service

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I read a variation of this news in the past where there was some major controversy about Google accounts that have active YouTube channels with videos uploaded to it. The solution is that Google would not delete inactive accounts if they have uploaded YouTube videos on it. I just don't know of this policy still stands or if they changed their minds.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

There are videos I still visit and were uploaded more than 10 years ago. It would be a shame losing them all, pieces of internet history instantly gone.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If someone has a link to where this policy is/was, then we can validate whether this is still in place or was a "pinky promise" not to before swiftly undoing said promise.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It misses the most important information: why.

The CNIL (French privacy regulator) slapped Discord in October last year because they never deleted accounts (hi GDPR).

Since then, all tech companies are hurriedly designing a plan to mass delete inactive accounts.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good, these companies hoard data for far too long

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They will delete the account, not the data.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

"If a Google Account has not been used or signed into for at least 2 years, we may delete the account and its contents – including content within Google Workspace (Gmail, Docs, Drive, Meet, Calendar) and Google Photos," tech giant Google confirmed in a post on its blog.

Thanks GDPR

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Lawyer speak

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Can't they delete the contents of an account after backing it up to some server somewhere that only they have access to?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

From TFA, they delete the data.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course they will remove the data. If they kept the data while removing the users ability to delete it they would get a record breaking fine for Christmas.

Besides they don't actually care about individual data after they finish processing it, they just care about the resulting aggregate data. Wasting money keeping the emails that they don't need would be cartoon villain level of stupid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If they anonymize the data so that it's no longer possible to identify you GDPR allows them to keep the data.

Wasting money keeping the emails that they don't need would be cartoon villain level of stupid.

Yeah.... Because there is no money in machine learning and it will never benefit from text written by humans...