I feel like they're going to have a monumentally more difficult time on this one considering Android supports other playstores.
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
123 points (97.7% liked)
Technology
59287 readers
6276 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
...and sideloading. That's a thing on Android, right? Can't Epic just make their own store for Android anyway?
they already have
And direct sideloading. Epic could offer the apk on their own site and process the payments directly themselves for free. It mostly seems they are complaining customers won't buy as much stuff if they can't use google pay, and they don't want to offer it because it's too expensive, which is inconvenient sure, but I don't see it being enough to sue and win.
I think the problem with side loading and other stores are the saftey warnings google shows discouraging others from installing them.
Maybe something will come out of that to make it less scary if they go through some process?
Have they exhausted the appeals on the original case? Cus now they're up against precedent which they themselves established.
No, they're appealing. That's not settled. And fuck Epic, but this practice has to end. Luckily the EU is finally doing that. And I hope it will go to consoles as well.
The fee is standard across many industries, including attorneys.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The latest threat will unfold in a San Francisco federal court, where a 10-person jury will decide whether Google's digital payment processing system in the Play Store, which distributes apps for phones running on its Android software, has been illegally driving up prices for consumers and developers.
The trial before U.S. District Judge James Donato is scheduled to last until just before Christmas and include testimony from longtime Google executive Sundar Pichai, who is now CEO of the company's parent, Alphabet Inc.
Pichai recently took the witness stand in Washington D.C., during an antitrust trial pitting Google's long-running dominance of internet search against the U.S. Justice Department's attempt to undercut it on the grounds that the company has been abusing its power to stifle competition and innovation.
Much like Apple did in its trial, Google defends its commissions as a way to be compensated for all money that it invests into its Play Store and asserts that the controls over it are a way to protect the security of the tens of millions of people in the U.S. who download apps for phones powered by Android.
Google initially was going to have to defend itself against multiple foes in the trial, but in September it settled allegations that had been brought against the Play Store by state attorneys general and just last week resolved a case being pursued by Match Group, the owner of Tinder and other online dating services.
Epic CEO Tim Sweeney skewered the "user choice billing" option as a sham in a social media post vowing to fight Google in court.
The original article contains 634 words, the summary contains 261 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!