this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
194 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59123 readers
2294 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.::The British Museum is digitizing its entire collection of more than eight million pieces, at a total cost of over $12 million. This move was announced after the museum experienced a theft back in August.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Only 12 million? Sounds like a steal. The British museum has everything. That's really good

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Only 12 million? Sounds like a steal

I mean that's like 12 million more than they paid for it...

It is the British museum after all

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Now THAT was a steal

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Very witty and original joke

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

If anyone wants more detail. The 2021/2022 capital expenditures for the British Museum totaled just over £25M. The digitization will take at least 5 years. So at worst a 10% increase per year in capital expenditures for them.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1093002/E02763183_HC_438_British_Museum_ARA_2022_WEB.pdf

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

No kidding. It seems reckless that they haven't done it yet.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The thefts weren't recent, they started stealing that collection decades ago.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Higgs is suspected to have taken uncategorized items and selling them on the e-commerce website eBay. One item worth $64,000 was offered for online auction for as little as $51 and listings for artifacts from the museum’s collection appeared online as early as 2016, according to a report in the Telegraph.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The stealing I meant was the British Museum's acquisition of the collection, but this too.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With all my respects if you repatriate them here in Mexico they will end up in some gangsters villa. The ministry of culture is weaker than their coked up limp dicks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oh well that's a drag :(

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Lol that was my first thought when I read this too. Nonetheless, there's zero chance of any of the historical artifacts being repatriated to their countries of origin now. It's a big loss.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

So the museum famous for stealing its artifacts is complaining about said stuff being stolen from them?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Why is the cost a problem. 12 mill might be a lot of money for like, some guy, but the government is responsible for the artifacts and deal with national budgets in the trillions.

If they dont want to pay for security storage and backups, send the peices back to their countries of origin. Maybe they can find some way of protecting history, cause England sure doesn't want the responsibility

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

After they've scanned it all will they be returning it to the countries they stole them from?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course not. People can't be trusted to take care of their own historical artifacts. Britain will take better care of them. If they want to see it, they can just pay to fly across the world to see them. It's surely better this way.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's not currently up to the British Museum; it's up to Parliament. Repatriating artifacts is currently illegal under UK law.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Museum_Act_1963

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

We can’t do it because it’s against the law that we made that says it’s illegal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but I don't see any of the leadership at the museum advocating against that law.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You could write them a letter and ask, I suppose?

It's dishonest to say "I don't see X" when you haven't made any effort to look for X.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

$12 million - a bargain for digitizing the collection for eternity.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why the fuck is anyone writing an article about $12M dollars?

Do people not understand what rich people make from passive investments? Literally just repurpose a single rich person's passive investment and you can pay to digitize a library's worth of artifacts every year for eternity.

Society is absolutely fucked in the head if anyone is allowed to build a yacht without getting crowbarred in the back of the calf while we're considering whether or not "we can afford to pay" to preserve priceless historical artifacts.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Thieves all the way down.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cost of securing your intangibly and financially valuable physical assets for all time and ease of "sharing" losslessly with other museums?

Priceless.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A virtual version of the museum in 2029? What would be the point in going? I can look at a picture of a picture on the internet for free.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I get what you mean, like there's definitely some stuff you can just look at a picture of it on the internet, but I guess for others it's about the sense of space, connection, grouping, narrative, context etc that's present with a well put together Museum or Gallery display.

Without all that, you've just got a car boot sale of random things - wheras the text, maps, illustrations, audio, video or 3d recreations etc that sits alongside - or simply the placement of things next to one another, or following through the room in a particular order is what really makes that stuff interesting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It only took a couple hundred years for them to respond to all the theft they did? Better late than never I guess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What does it cost? How much of their collection?

I just read it 3 times in the feed, first post title, then preview of link, then op comment :D