this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
43 points (92.2% liked)

UK Politics

3811 readers
181 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Added context is mine. Its like he wants the SNP to take over Holyrood next year. Not doing his little Englander image any good in Scotland with comments like this, just another colonialist

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

refusal to grant a referendum while also striking down any devolved laws they don't like? that's not a union that's colonisation.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No PM is really going to want to agree to one. It's going to take a lot of pressuring and strong SNP showings in both parliaments to get to a stage where a PM considers it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, understandable, but he could have not answered too

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

The most annoying thing politicians do is not answering the question.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

non-brit here. i watched a season of Bakeoff where one of the contestants mentioned being a unionist while making a patriotic cake or something like that. from the outside it is utterly fucking weird to have someone's political stance be "Everything Is Fine Like This, You Are Actually Happy Where You Are, Do Not Consider Leaving"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

What is it that you find strange exactly?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why would there be one anytime soon?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Brexit invalidated the results because many voted for the sole purpose of staying in the EU, public support is now at a majority, and Reform getting in would raise support significantly.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I dunno, maybe people in Scotland keep electing pro indy majorities or some other antidemocratic guff. Holyrood is going to the polls next year

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (4 children)

That’s a bold word to use, considering Scotland got started on colonialism before England did, and the Scotch were the most vigorously committed members of the colonial service and military.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, if anyone would know, it’s you.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Why not just call my mum names while you're at it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago

Was she also named after a chain of off-licences?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Scotch is a bold word to use when trying to take the moral high ground, you xenophobe.

Can you provide a source for your claim of being the most vigorously committed members or are you just talking out your arse?

The first English overseas expansion occurred as early as 1169, when the Norman invasion of Ireland began to establish English possessions in Ireland, with thousands of English and Welsh settlers arriving in Ireland.[3] As a result of this the Lordship of Ireland was claimed for centuries by the English monarch

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_overseas_possessions

Scotland's colonialism began in the 1600s, quite a bit later than the 1100s...

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Chaps like Henry Dundas (literally put upon a pedestal, and former head of the EIC) made a vast amount of wealth that was used to build Scottish cities, found its banks and institutions. Scotland was obsessed with education, and what the educated did was they got work administering colonial affairs. And of course, the very enthusiastic colonisation of Ireland.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So literally nothing that the English and Welsh didn't also do. We were all bastards.

Olap's mention of Starmer being a colonialist is because he is outright denying the chance of a democratic process, regardless of what the Scottish electorate desire, like a colonialist would do. Not to mention his support for Israel, a true modern colonial power.

Maybe think next time before you go running to defend an antidemocratic genocide supporter and keep your bigotry to yourself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not to mention his support for Israel,

What support?

We stopped weapons sales and condemned them, have called for a two-state solution, and their leader is calling Starmer an anti-Semite.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That is a very recent change, his stance until just a few weeks ago has been very pro-Israel. Even now, his stance is the weakest form of condemnation possible, from an ex human rights lawyer, for what is an atrocity on par with the likes of the holocaust and holodomor.

This documentary gives more information about Starmer's faction in Labour's weaponisation of "antisemitism":

https://youtu.be/elp18OvnNV0

Other related information:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_work_of_the_Labour_Party%27s_Governance_and_Legal_Unit_in_relation_to_antisemitism,_2014%E2%80%932019

https://www.thenational.scot/news/25214288.keir-starmer-confronted-uk-claim-no-genocide-gaza/

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 days ago

I presume therefore as such a passionate advocate for democracy that, if Scotland became independent, you would support a decennial referendum on joining the UK? Or is only the “right” result worthy of being deemed a democratic process?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Didnae say we weren't. Wouldn't use that word to describe us today. Unlike Starmer

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why do Scot’s say didnae but not wouldnae?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As ye wudnae sae didnae tae yer ma, did ye?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Yo no hablo Scots, señor.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Was that before the union?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It fairly directly caused the union

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Thankfully his days as prime minister are numbered.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Do you think Farage would be more amenable?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah nah. Anything to keep Scotland from joining the EU I bet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

What's the likelihood of Scotland being allowed EU membership though?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The hard part would be imposing a customs border between it and the rUK (they’re economically tightly integrated). Beyond that, there’s no queue, so they wouldn’t be waiting behind Azerbaijan or something, and their institutions either already meet EU standards or are close to doing so.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The hard part would be preventing Spain from using its veto. The customs border would be merely nearly impossible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I suppose so! I guess the big issues would be the deficit (and the exact methodology accepted to calculate this, timelines to resolve, etc), and the possibility of a veto by another member state not wishing to encourage the splitting up of larger nations.

I know that Spain have previously said they won't block, provided a vote of independence is constitutional, but that would also rely on UK Gov. recognising it, I guess?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The cards are up in the air. Reach out, you might catch an ace.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

This is true. You don't find out if you don't try!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Probably very low. They aren't even close to meeting the entry criteria.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Are they not? I've read various things stating that they almost already meet most requirements (being ex. EU anyway).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Farage will do whatever his paymaster says and that usually is cause chaos and disunity. I'd imagine Farage (if he gets into power) will call one , but with 2-3 years campaigning for maximum effect. Russia wont care who wins/loses as long as there is disunity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Farage will do whatever his paymaster says

And that will not be run the nation. At best (as far as leading), he will form a coalition with the Tories his paymasters trust/ Or back out of most seats come the election.

His paymasters want exactly what they have wqith the current right wing labour. Maybe more so.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Obviously not. But that’s not how PMs are chosen outside of election time. If Starmer is replaced as Labour leader, that person will likely become PM.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Once in a lifetime. " SNP - This matter should have been settled for 50-100 years.

But Russias money is so good and its so easy to blame someone else.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Write the whole quote not just the bit you like.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sorry , I was wrong with 'once in a lifetime' the exact language used was 'once in a generation'

“The debate we are engaged in as a nation is about the future of all of us lucky enough to live in this diverse and vibrant country. It is a rare and precious moment in the history of Scotland - a once in a generation opportunity to chart a better way.” Alex Salmond.

“It is the view of the current Scottish Government that a referendum is a once-in-a-generation opportunity." Scottish Government White Paper.

Did they have their fingers crossed behind their back when they said these things?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Having a once-on-a-lifetime holiday doesn't preclude you from having another holiday on the chance it's another once-in-a-lifetime holiday.

And "opportunity" adds a whole bunch of context. Support was high for independence, a government was in power that was (and still is) popular and progressive, and the UK government agreed to respect the result. That, to me, is what "opportunity" means: the time is right.
If there is another surge of support, another Scottish government is elected on the premise of independence and delivers such a crushing victory as the SNP did, then it's just down to the UK government denying the Scottish Government.

load more comments
view more: next ›