this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
918 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

69347 readers
3023 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Well, this is a solid admission that they are going to use deep fakes to influence elections.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Are least it's evidence that worry they might need to need to influence anther election.

Silver lining...?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Noo we just demand this specific instance of deregulation because... uh, it theoretically might help small businesses!

Also why would you even care about anything other than short-term GDP increase. Are you some kind of communist?!?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 12 hours ago

Minnesota scraps that law and uses Elon's deepfakes to claim he wants to destroy Medicare

Elon calls for laws banning deepfakes

[–] [email protected] 14 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

can elon and linda hurry up and die already

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago

Rich people live a lot longer than us.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So is their position that deception via impersonation is free speech?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Who can make a deep fake of der Elon professing his love for trans people? Wherein he states that he was wrong about the woke mind virus. That he wishes he had been born to a black family.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago

Something only a childish brat would even think to try

[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"what do you mean we can't use fake misleading videos to fuck democracy?"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

"The rules were you guys weren't gonna fact check."

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How isn't this immediately a red flag?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

There are so many flags right now it’s just a sea of red undulations. Done by design, so that we don’t notice the death of democracy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago

They overwhelm everyone knowing that 80% of this shit is gonna get outlawed or overturned, but that 20% that gets through is gonna be huge for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

because one side is prioritizing democratic principles and the other is making an argument that could be related to the first amendment. Twitter absolutely isn't doing this for any good reason, but the argument could be used for one.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

If you have to tell deliberate lies to influence people then that isn’t democracy. That’s fascism or at least a kakistocracy - the worst and stupidest rule because they can’t get elected otherwise. Fuck twisting the First Amendment into a tool of lies and corruption.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

the problem I have is that the law (609.772) appears to not only apply to political content, but all content that is

"so realistic that a reasonable person would believe it depicts speech or conduct of an individual who did not in fact engage in such speech or conduct; " and made without consent and wintin 90 days of political party conventions or after absentee voting starts.

By the way it is written the "presidents play Minecraft" series which most informed people would fully understand was not made my any presidents would likely fall under this law.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

I propose for every lie someone tells, we (we'll vote on who) gets to punch them in the face.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Can we join forces and spam X with a flood of Informative deep fakes of select individuals?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You could, but it would just be limited reach. There is no way to fight back using his own platform beyond just not going there.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago

Something that has been bothering me lately. Reasonable people who counter the toxic misinformation leaving the platform only allows the disease to grow and spread. But reality is they weren't reaching the people that needed the dose of reality anyway. And then I realized that the algorithms have always been the disease, my feeds are my own echo chamber to drive engagement, just as theirs are. I've pretty much cut all social networks out. The only way to change minds is honest respectable conversation, and I am not a person to change anyone's mind.

We're fucked

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

Link me some and I'll have fun with it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

My state will see you in court.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is what the right is doing, while the DNC is censuring their own members for simply encouraging democrats to run against their own apathetic incumbents.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago

You misspelled pathetic.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would they want to "influence elections"?

Sounds shady.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

It's a huge part of the business model. Social Media is valuable for its data on people, and for its ability to manipulate and influence people.

[–] [email protected] 179 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"The rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact-check."

[–] [email protected] 24 points 22 hours ago

Delivering that line with such glee like he thought he had some sort of high ground.

Makes me sick.

[–] [email protected] 202 points 1 day ago

"You guys aren't gonna use AI for bad stuff, right?"

Tech oligarchs: whaaaaaat no we actually want to be regulated because of how dangerous this technology is!! Also tech oligarchs:

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago

Cool. Let's go with criminal impersonation, defamation, and slander/libel instead them!

[–] [email protected] 130 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember when this stuff was called "the quiet part', and it was considered bad when you said it out loud?

Yeah...good times.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 day ago

What a fucking chode.

If you need it to be legal to deepfake to manipulate politics you’re the problem.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Here the guy that was going to leave politics and go back to Tesla.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

X’s lawsuit claims the law’s “requirements are so vague and unintelligible that social media platforms cannot understand what the statute permits and what it prohibits.”

The issue with this argument is that social media platforms aren't required to enforce it? https://www.sos.mn.gov/media/5626/deep-fake-overview.pdf

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

X’s lawsuit claims the law’s “requirements are so vague and unintelligible that social media platforms cannot understand what the statute permits and what it prohibits.”

Vague, overly broad laws are indeed a problem; I’m willing to give him that. ONLY that.

Unfortunately for Musk, this is not vague. If the footage is something you created or manipulated, you know perfectly damn well whether it’s legal or not. He’s trying to confuse the issue, and conflate fraud with free speech. Hopefully, the court will see right through him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago

And the Fake News crowd goes wild! By the way, that's conservatives and all of their media.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Elon Musk, Republican President who is literally BANKROLLING THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN PARTY, SUING because he can't Create Fake News with AI, is PROOF that DEMOCRATS are the Fake News!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Next up: Elmo challenges laws that prohibit murder and child pornography, all in the name of a better world!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

He had that fetish roleplay account where he pretended to be his toddler…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

The dude is convinced he can "win" by out-procreating everyone else, it's obvious he has some very serious mental issues that need addressing but he'll never actually do the work required to be better. He's exactly like the Quiverfull people trying to out-populate their perceived enemies, assuming their descendents will follow their same credo.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago

“How will we win if we can’t cheat?”

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›