150kWatt and a top speed of 145? That's kind of insane?
Wait a minute, mph not km/h I guess.
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
458 points (93.4% liked)
Technology
69347 readers
3424 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Everyone seems to hate this thing based on marketing but I actually kind of liked the looks of it, sigh.
Yeah, what's wrong with it? It looks like a simple truck for around town use, and it's fairly cheap.
Where’s the bullet point for Bezos? Hard pass if that shit bag is involved in anyway.
Cool but now I’m worried this is being spammed everywhere. New capitalism marketing at foot?
yea im already slightly tired of seeing this truck after the day(s) it's been promoted.
Really? This is the first place I've seen it. Then again, I use an ad blocker everywhere.
Every news website is covering it. I think I've spotted most of 10 articles around the place.
The law of well-marketed unreleased goods dictates that this vehicle is not going to meet any of the promises mentioned in the articles.
Something like this I imagine I'd be happy with. A sedan/crossover and this. Wouldn't take it out the county. Just trips to hardware/gardening stores and moving furniture. More than enough range and speed to go to work too. Any long drive I'd probably get an Accord hybrid or something. 2 vehicle family
Same. We have two cars and three kids. One needs to be comfortable for longer trips, camping, etc, and the other just needs to go to work and back. This would be perfect for the second, and double as a furniture, garden stuff , dump, etc hauler around town.
I personally hate trucks, but this is in the price range and could be handy.
Very interesting, but please give me power windows and a dumb infotainment unit that does Android Auto/CarPlay. No Internet connection. No integration with the rest of the car.
and lose the blinding headlights and automatic high beams
Available as optional extras
Can someone please convert some of these numbers to freedom units? Specifically the range, horsepower, torque, and 0-60 numbers?
I actually think for once, you guys do it
0-60mph is mostly deprecated these days in favor of 0-62mph, which just so happens to be the same as 0-100km/h
what a coincidence!
I'm aware of this, and it's not the same because there is a 2 MPH difference. So the 0-60 number will be smaller, albeit slightly.
They specified 1 significant figure
at that level it's the same.
I struggle to understand the point of a truck that can only tow 500kg… that and such awful range. If the range were doubled this would be a great deal, but as is it’s just dead in the water.
$20k with some cargo for a car is pretty good. If you need a F150, then you'll have to pay for one.
I mean, are there any cars available in the US for just $20k? I'm pretty sure a base Mazda 3 was more than that when we bought ours five years ago (before the pandemic, and ours is a higher trim model). I don't think they're making the really small cars any more (like the Toyota Yaris).
Short version, I'm skeptical of this price point for even a small pickup. Great if they can do it.
That's because you're thinking of trucks used first and foremost for heavy duty "truck stuff." That is not the only market for trucks, at least in the US: https://www.thedrive.com/news/26907/you-dont-need-a-full-size-pickup-truck-you-need-a-cowboy-costume
According to Edwards’ data, 75 percent of truck owners use their truck for towing one time a year or less (meaning, never). Nearly 70 percent of truck owners go off-road one time a year or less. And a full 35 percent of truck owners use their truck for hauling—putting something in the bed, its ostensible raison d’être—once a year or less.
It can probably tow more, usually 500 kg is like the bare minimum for American cars. Also us towing standards are a bit more strict. A car in the EU is rated to tow more than a car in the US, even if it's identical.
Even if it were 1000kg, that’s still way below what a truck would want to tow though.
Depends on the truck owner. It's not going to haul a boat, but it can probably do lumber (though the bed is kinda short and narrow), gardening stuff, and camping gear. That's basically what I'd want a truck for, plus the odd piece of furniture.
Low towing capacity and an outrageously miserable bed size. Less than five feet? The powertrain of this should have been put in a station wagon, not a "truck."
There used to be a market for small trucks which has all largely evaporated. I'm all in favour of a smaller utility truck with limited range. Something like this would be ideal for my business.
239 miles / 150 miles for big/small battery in angry eagle units.
Under $20k after federal incentives*
Yeah, this is my issue with the government incentives for EVs, especially now that they are more common and can be deducted from the sale price. Most retailers are just jacking up the price to whatever the cap for the rebate is while pretending it's still a good deal.
This is the same argument used for blaming the cost of college on government loans for education, for $$$ housing prices in cities that offer low income subsidies, for food prices due to food stamps...
Those programs do have an effect on pricing. Not 1 to 1 with the cost subsidization and even if it does there's plenty of arguments to keep programs like that around.
However I'd rather see moves made to encourage positive behaviors, like purchasing an electric vehicle, that didn't translate into a dealership subsidy.
I hardly think $27.5k could be considered "jacking up the price" but I also don't appreciate advertising pricing that is dependent on a government incentive that may not even exist when the vehicles are actually delivered.
view more: next ›