Wild how they turned one of the most wholesome social networks (as wholesome as social media can be) into just another politics filled hole.
this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
464 points (98.1% liked)
Technology
60659 readers
4984 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Meta says its working urgently to fix a problem
WTF BBC
it’s
The BBC have been getting worse and worse about this. Back when I had a twitter account, I'd screenshot their mistakes, circle them in red, give corrections and tell them "Must do better."
That is tame for them. I’m convinced no one prof reads their articles anymore.
prof
the joke writes itself
Dammit!
"If these issues are not resolved quickly they risk fuelling conspiracy theories and damaging Meta's reputation."
Meta has a reputation? Surely, that thing was mutilated beyond all recognition a decade ago. And conspiracy theories are Meta's bread and butter.
While users who type "#Democrat" or "#Democrats" see no results, the hashtag "Republican" returns 3.3 million posts on the social media platform.
By manually searching Instagram for "Democrats", rather than clicking on a hashtag, users are greeted by a screen reading "we've hidden these results".
"Results for the term you searched for may contain sensitive content," it says.
There are also limited results when people search for "Republicans" as opposed to "Republican".
And I'm sure the "free-speech absolutists" were up in arms. /s
TBH, if you're searching Facebook for information, all you're gonna get is ragebait anyway, even when it works. Also, why are you still on Facebook?
Zuck is just following the orders he got at Mar-a-Lago.
They say "resolved quickly" as if it was an error and not something intended.
the error was that it didn't show the curated results they intended and instead showed nothing
Normally I'd apply Hanlon's Razor and give the benefit of the doubt, but Meta lost the right to charitability long ago and deserves no such kindness or respect until they have a long pattern of acting in the public's interests.
Likely they were training their AI to lean right and it went nuts. No human would be dumb enough to sign off on something that blatant.
You haven't met many humans, have you?
I think "explicitly allowing hate speech with examples" has done most of the recent damage to whatever their "reputation" is at this point.
Them actively suppressing non-fashy political views is basically expected.
It’s not a bug, it’s a feature!
Is there a list of alternatives we can provide to the old folks to get them off of the nazi apps? (Meta, twitter, instagram, etc)
Well it’s been quick to start the limitation of options… not their first rodeo it seems.
My conspiracy theory here is that the person tasked with implementing The new policy filters Was either pissed off and or lazy And just use the most obvious filter they could come up with
I'm working on a theory about your capitalization choices. Secret message when unscrambled:
B E S U R E T O D R I N K Y O U R O V A L T I N E
Voice to text is hit or miss. When I'm lazy about fixing typos that's WhAt HAAPenS
That's because Social Media is Bias AGAINST Republicans!
They found out. Quickly half fix it for a little while
the same platform that is home to (going worse) 9/11, racism, antisemitism, sexism, edge lord neo-nazism and worst of all homophobia/transphobia
Playing devil's advocate, could it have been used to avoid persecution of these people now that the Emperor has returned and the crazies think they have mandate to "hunt"? There's a non negligible chance that whoever decided this, lives in California, and thinks of themselves as quite liberal, they're just too greedy to quit the job at Meta because that 6-7 figure income is worth it even when it means being complicit to the 4th Reich.
