this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
123 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3586 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Warrantless Mass Surveillance... so hot right now

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right now? Where have you been for the last two decades?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been complaining about it the whole time, were you not listening?

It's hot right now, and it was before too

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Both our accounts are 3 months old.

I was probably next to you complaining about it with a different anonymous account.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

The DHS is a shameful boondoggle and should not be.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sounds like time for a bot army.

This is the DHS we're talking about, after all. The dregs of the 3-letter agencies, you could probably fool them with an old iPad and a 6 year old randomly pasting comments around.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Everything keeps getting more and more dystopian.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Who's ready for the flight risk category 👋👋

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

What does Toothless have to do with the DHS?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m actually fine with this. It’s essentially reading through information made publicly available by the users themselves and determining if they are a threat based on that information.

This is literally what we want. This isn’t surveillance of private data, this is watching what people themselves put into the public.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This isn’t surveillance of private data

Yet

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That’s the line we draw. Digging into people’s private data in the name of security is inherently an invasion of privacy. This is… looking at public information.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sounds like the moral score of China