this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
412 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

58727 readers
4182 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 159 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Is the future just having a human slave in a third world country strap into VR and carry your groceries for you?

[–] [email protected] 114 points 4 days ago (4 children)

That's basically what happens right now. Remember Amazon's smart grocery store? It was just people in India watching cameras. Computer vision wasn't capable of it.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 4 days ago

AI (Anonymous Indians)

[–] [email protected] 52 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Makes me wonder how much of Tesla’s “Full Self Driving” is just some dude playing GTA VR with you in the passenger seat.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If it was actually that it would work better…

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Have you seen humans drive? Now imagine them driving with significant visual and steering input latency, distorted wide angle cameras, and the lack of steering and acceleration feedback. Unless they are used to sim racing, I bet most people would drive worse than Tesla's FSD if done remotely.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, I think the self driving taxis across the us apparently need human interaction every 6 minutes on average... So are they self driving? I don't know.

We can't use our phones and drive, but someone can have a screen and drive 6 cars at the same time...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

And I only need human interaction every few days. Take that AI... :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure this story was blown out of proportion and exaggerated. These people were training and validating the automated systems not watching the cameras 24/7.

That's how AI is trained, manual intervention. It wasn't working as well as they hoped, but it wasn't humans watching cameras in real time.

https://www.theverge.com/2024/4/17/24133029/amazon-just-walk-out-cashierless-ai-india

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It sounds like the best way to bootstrap a machine learning system. You generate the data the system will be seeing in production along with the proper labels. Then in a later stage you can start doing reinforcement learning.

The problem is the lying about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's not true at all. I personally know a person who worked on that technology.

Human beings got involved only when necessary. Do you really think Amazon wants to pay humans to be cashiers?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Do you really think Amazon wants to pay humans to be cashiers?

No but if they spend a bunch of money and time designing it, spend a bunch of time and money retrofitting stores, and then a bunch of time and money marketing it and the technology doesn't actually work when it's 'showtime,' I can easily see a company with deep pockets like Amazon faking it all by hiring dirt cheap labor to make it seem like it works rather than the alternative.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 116 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Turk in a box you say? I'm shocked! Shocked!

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 days ago

Well, not that shocked.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He also said that it would result in an “age of abundance” where the cost of everything would drop dramatically.

This never, never, ever happens when they say it will happen. It's always the opposite. Prices go up, jobs disappear, new subscriptions appear, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

It may or may not, you as a consumer will simply never see it. Any costs savings gets gobbled up.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We live in a fucking nightmare. Rich assholes wining and dining with robots while most of the world fucking suffers. It's actually crazy. We are bringing into our reality what was just a bad dream like 50 years ago. This is just wild man.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 4 days ago (2 children)

All those sci-fi novels were meant as warnings not instruction manuals

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Torment Nexus

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I'm betting my two balls that Elysium becomes a real thing

[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Every conference/tech showcase is carefully staged to maximize investments.

Well, often times not Tesla.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is still so weird to me. Couldn't they even lie right? Use a plastic window just for that car. Apparently it doesn't matter to tesla customers that the end product is shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I think the actual claim is that the truck in general is bulletproof (meaning the metal bits), not that every part of the truck is bulletproof. Here's a video testing that claim, it is bulletproof for certain calibers, but not for larger calibers.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 4 days ago

Whaaaat? A company whose market valuation is almost entirely built on a perpetual lie about automation they are delivering “someday” lied about their ability to deliver automation??

I am shocked, I tell you. Shocked.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 days ago

Elon Musk loves a fake presentation.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 days ago

The people apologizing for this sort of behavior, even here, just shows how easy it is to manipulate people.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You remember the first time Musk talked about robotaxis? He never delivered. This robotaxi is another vaporware

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Yeah, Tesla made this claim about the model X being full self driving in 5 years and being able to become an autonomous taxi while you weren't using it. Still waiting on that one...

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Similar to the company who just dressed up models as robots for their presentation

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

I feel that almost certainly that is where Musk got the idea from, it worked for them, etc!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago

i'm expecting the first million optimus robots will be remote controlled by armies of 'trainers' and elon will claim the ai will use the footage to train itself to do everything later, but we need a trillion+ dollars of compute to achieve that, but the software and hardware required are simply not possible at any budget anytime soon. maybe its good enough to have mass remote slavery for some.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Maybe there's a brain in there imported from some poor country.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

The real reason for the brain implant chips company… brains in jars controlling robots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Question - assuming they are human controlled, how do these compare with bots created by competitors like Boston Dynamics?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago

They don’t. They are not competitors. This is not a product that exists as a real purchasable item. Those little robot dog toys are closer to BD than what Elon has done here.

load more comments
view more: next ›