this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
21 points (88.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

19187 readers
1304 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I don’t see anyone outside so it checks out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is capitalism, not which kernel everything runs. And the reason FOSS isn't universal is also capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's more complicated to make money producing FOSS, capitalism or not. Lots of reasonable developers would still choose closed source even without capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Making money is a capitalist adjacent idea. The premise that we need money to figure out how to allocate resources is foolish

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The premise that we need money to figure out how to allocate resources is foolish

Money not necessarily, we need to calculate costs (and minimize it) in distributed fashion.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm still waiting for someone to propose in detail an alternative.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's the problem. We don't have the requisite technology to build a Star Trek utopia. If only we did…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well, if everything ran Linux...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Aren’t the majority of computers already on Linux? Unless you mean desktops

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Majority... yeah, Android smartphone and servers would be a really really big number.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Most computers in the world are not desktops

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No one would agree on the visual design, and most people would just want an unstyled box because it’s more efficient.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If Linux was dominant it wouldn’t be Linux. There would be more pressure to monetize and there would always be someone willing to sell out for that money. You can see this even in the Linux community today. I’m sorry I had to be so negative about it though, it sounds nice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe it should say, “If the world went open source, and capitalism went away.”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even fantasy should have some limits folks c'mon now

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Which is more fantastical? Unlimited profits and line going up forever in a finite world? Or capitalism actually ending so all lives can live free from subjugation?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

At least it would be GPL tho.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Who, exactly, do you think would "sell out for money", and why would they have the power to do so? Linux is huge, and the pressure to monetize is there now. Plenty of people have been trying to monetize Linux - and in many cases, succeeding - for decades now. Why do you think being dominant would change that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If windows didn't exist, linux would dominate with the problems you describe, and we'd still see this meme, but advocating for FreeBSD instead.

That being said, I like them both. It's been a while since I last used bsd, so I think it's about time I give it another spin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm unsure. I switch between MacOS and Linux regularly.

I'd reckon Apple's OS would dominate the "user friendly" space(not saying Linux is bad, just what everyone memes).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

they miss the statue of Linus Torvalds

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really. Having heterogeneity among operating systems is better than pure homogeneity. Say, if everyone ran Linux, and some massive security flaw was discovered, we would all be screwed at the same time. However, if we ran different stuff, and some massive security hole was found for just one operating system, then only a small portion of the world is vulnerable at once. Besides, more operating systems can lead to more innovation, as long as there is good competition between them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If the whole world focused and used just 1 OS for every system for a long enough time line, I think it would evolve fast enough to reach a point of perfection, where there are no security holes or flaws of any kind. I do believe that while programming has many ways of doing the same task, there is always an objectively best way to do it. Eventually the best way to do everything an OS needs to do would be found; it would be faster if there was only 1 OS to work with to reach that point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I do believe that while programming has many ways of doing the same task, there is always an objectively best way to do it.

Language has many ways of expressing the same thing, is there an objectively best way to do it?

Is that sentence the best way to ask that question?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, you missed the homeless encampments, forest fires and car centric cities.

There's no apt install utopia.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Because you have forgotten sudo