If everyone keeps on as if this law doesn't exist, they'll struggle to enforce it. Don't cave; make the law unworkable. And if you use a VPN, choose one from a company based overseas.
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
79 points (94.4% liked)
Privacy
31253 readers
565 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Mullvad!
-Posted from canada
I think you'd be foolish not to do so. Make sure that you also abandon any software that collapses to UK legal pressure.
I thought the legal bits were for those running the services, not those using them?
The TLDR is that when E2EE that allows the government to monitor its contents without giving up encryption for everyone else becomes technically possible, those running the services must assist the government in doing so.
They literally cannot enforce this, just like their attempted ban on porn
Yes keep using them. You'd be a fool not to.
https should be enforced by any proper websites. This won't change. Imagine sending your mail in clear envelopes. Would you bank like that?
Vpns will work. This cannot change, it would affect business and other legitimate uses for them even if it was enforceable.
You can use encrypted DNS over HTTPS or TLS easily to further enhance your encrypted self.
Fuck what some uninformed middle manager type bell end has come up with. Bail out of any company or product that bends over for them.
I'm not based in the UK, so I can't speak to your specific legal risk, so always do what's best for your safety.
But if able, I would encourage you to continue to use your VPN until you can no longer do so. Support end to an encryption wherever you can, there's a huge difference between the law as written, and the law as enforced. Normalize encryption as much as you can.
If encryption is illegal locally, probably won't be able to pay for VPNs using standard payment methods in the future, so start using a VPN that supports anonymous payments now. Like Mullvad, airvpn etc.
Privacy is a human right
Yes, it is still OK to use those services. The law is aimed at the messaging/social media businesses, not individuals, and is vague enough that they won't have to do anything around their E2EE until there is viable technology available to square the circle of allowing for the checking of illegal abuse content while not functionally destroying E2EE. So potentially never.
no clue, I’d love to know too.
Maybe crosspost or create a post on Mastodon and tag them (signal, protonvpn, protonmail, tutanota, …)
How do you cross post on Lemmy?
In the web version, there should be a button (eg see https://lemmy.world/post/1067695). On mobile apps, my guess is it depends. I usually do it manually, the old copy-and-paste, and also provide the link to the original post.