this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
33 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59148 readers
2260 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

All smartphones, including iPhones, must have replaceable batteries by 2027 in the EU::undefined

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank fucking god for the EU, for fighting for global digital rights where nobody else does.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

According to republicans Europe is hell on Earth tho

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anywhere that isn’t a fascist theocracy is hell on Earth to many republicans

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I'm sure many places that are are still Hell because they aren't majority white and not fascist enough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

mostly cuz EU gives rights and protections to consumers, not corporations

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

They’re still liberal and give a lot more to corporations than they do people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apple in 2027: This is not a battery, it's a.....umm ....... Ultra High Density Low Current Super Capacitor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

EU: Ok, then in addition to that UHDLCSC you also need a removable battery.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It will also likely mean easier repairs. Louis Rossman just did a video on this

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The fact that some of the gen Z crowd think it will be horrible have forgotten that it was much easier to carry 2 batteries and swap them out vs carrying a charger and cable with you everywhere. Pop in the new battery, power it on and carry on with you now full battery phone. Being tethered to a wall so you can have 10% from 20 minutes of charging is crazy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I used to do this. I thought it was awesome but I was literally the only person I ever knew who did this. It was not a popular thing to do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'd much rather just have a bigger battery. Replacement is more useful for longevity for me.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Don't forget the option to carry a 30lb battery bank everywhere with you so you're at least tethered to something marginally more movable than a wall.

Seriously though, I miss my phone+battery in one charger and the ability to restart with full battery at around 4pm.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My current device and the two before that all have had removable batteries. I've always thought built in batteries are stupid and it's nice to finally notice that other people agree. Hopefully they next mandate that it has to be able to be taken apart with a screwdriver and spare parts must be able to be purchased straight from the manufacturer.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I prefer ip68 to easily accessible battery. I’ll need to change my battery maybe once every 3 years, but I need to know it can handle moisture far more often than that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Psst those Brands are not your friends and might lie about their reasons to make batteries non-removable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly good. Usb C is so good.

I have a couple of 100w chargers around the house, no messing about can charge nearly everything at full speed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's NOT just phones.

It's EVERYTHING with a battery. Including cars, laptops, e-bikes, video game controllers, headphones etc. (im not even sure if there are exceptions, such as tiny tiny "airpod" like things.. ?)

And they must be (with a few exceptions) replacable by a "layman", without the use of special tools - which means no heat pads, to soften up glue etc etc. (and for gods sake, i hope it also means apple can't hardwareID lock a battery)

an exception mentioned in the EU document about the law says, high power batteries for example in an electric car, must be done by a profesional - but of course it still has to be "replacable" and not.. tear the whole car apart and rebuild it using new batteries.

replacable batteries in headphones, bluetooth mice, laptops etc, is gonna be awesome.

and lets not forget, they have to recycle the old ones - and produce new batteries using recycled materials.

in fact, i will try to hold on replacing my current (2 year old) phone, and wait to get one before 2027. Usually the battery turns to shit in 3ish years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Gonna make a guess here and assume that the EU probably wants to increase lithium recycling. Removable batteries would probably make that goal a bit more achievable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

They better define the term «replacable» extensively !

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck the EU. I hope we still get good small phones and EU assholes only get big bloated as fuck ones.

This is EU actively making my phone more shitty.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who says there can't be SFF phones with replacable batteries. In fact, old samsung phones had replacable batteries.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And they were bigger than comparable htc's, were flimsy, and ip68 was a pipe dream.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All we need now is a headphone jack

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Can't imagine that getting mandated unfortunately

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Coming soon from Apple. Screws that require a 4D tesseract shaped screwdriver to undo.

But if you can undo them, feel free to change the battery.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The EU defines user replaceable as you can remove the batteries with common tools. Common tools is defined as a Phillips or flathead screwdriver. So even Nintendo and their stupid try-force screw thing won't be acceptable.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Stand back everyone, I'm going to attempt nuance.

Industrial design is about tradeoffs. Making the battery easily replaceable will come with drawbacks. Maybe it'll be size, or water resistance, or durability, but something will have to be compromised. The extent of the compromises remains to be seen, and people will have different opinions about whether it's worth it.

Ordinarily I'm not a fan of regulators making product design decisions, because that's exactly the kind of thing market forces are supposed to be good at. In this case, though, there's a demand that's clearly not being met, and companies clearly have a vested interest in pushing consumers toward replacing their old hardware rather than repairing it, which creates externalities markets are unable to account for. Market failures like this are exactly the kind of situation where government regulation is needed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Industrial design is about tradeoffs

Nope, for battery removal, nope!
Are you going to say that pentalobe screws is also a trade-off.

Also, smartphone are just too thin and it's because you use a case that you tend to forget about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Considering Samsung during their cost cutting days designed Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 without drawback just fine, I think everyone will be able to do it without drawback just fine as well.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Maybe it’ll be size, or water resistance, or durability, but something will have to be compromised.

definitely size at the least. We'll probably have to go back to removable backs so I imagine water proofing will be difficult without adding at least a little size.