this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
581 points (98.5% liked)

Today I Learned

17721 readers
423 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

From Wikipedia

In April 1977 Panthers were key supporters of the 504 Sit-ins, the longest of which was the 25-day occupation of the San Francisco Federal Building by over 120 people with disabilities. Panthers provided daily home-cooked meals in support of the protest's eventual success, which eventually led to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)thirteen years later.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 108 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They also were allied with groups of confederate rednecks with the understanding "we have incredibly different worldviews, but we're both poor and it's because of the rich folks in power"

The three-letter-agencies could not allow that kind of class consciousness so they assassinated Fred Hampton.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago (3 children)

And we're still poor because of the rich folks in power. The next step is obvious, TAX THE RICH!!!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Yeah... """tax""" 😉

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Tax applies to income. I don't think that would solve the issue for billionaires with no income. We need to just take their excess money away, in addition to 100% taxes on their income above a certain level

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Alright Mr/Ms IRS person, please do explain what does and doesn't qualify as 'income'...

Their wealth didn't just appear out of nowhere.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Most rich people are rich because their parents were rich. You can do a death tax, but that doesn't solve the problem because they'll continue to unfairly hoard that wealth for the rest of their life

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Indeed, most of the billionaires were born with a silver spoon up their ass. But their parents were only millionaires, there's no way that their offspring accumulated billions without income.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

3 billion dollars is three thousand million dollars. That's enough to hoard for generations without being taxed.

Or that money could be taken and used to end homelessness and provide services to pull families out of intergenerational poverty caused by the crimes committed by billionaire families

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

They aren't only using the value of their assets. Their assets grow there are dividends, there are payouts.

There's income. They don't have their money in checking account with no interest paid.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If your wealth increased, you have income.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Just because someone said they'll give three hundred zorkminds for your flortz when yesterday they offered two fifty doesn't mean you got income.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

TAX THE RICH!!!

Taxing the rich isn't going to solve squat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We're not trying to solve squat though.

We hope to help resolve actual problems on the Earth..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We hope to help resolve actual problems on the Earth

Getting rid of the rich will solve quite a few problems - taxing them won't.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Almost like they were about inclusiveness

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago

Fred was a big tent leftist for sure

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Fun fact: these amazing people are the reason Democrats and many Republicans voted in favor of gun control laws in California. They were racists that feared armed minorities protesting for equity and nipped that in the bud.

Now it's us Leftists holding our unarmed dicks in our hands while armed Christofascist Republicans are trying to take over the government, while we finger waggle at them and hope the racist cops are on our side since none of us have enough guns to counter their deterrence efforts.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yep, Reagan signed the gun control laws as governor after Black Panthers visited the Sacramento capital with guns.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

police reform would help everyone.

The only thing police "reform" has ever helped has been the police and the capitalists they protect.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This feeds my response to everyone who tried to pretend "All Lives Matter" or "Police shoot more white people than black people" was anything other than racist, bigoted obstructionism during 2020. There is no proposed police reform that I'm aware of which would only help black people. No matter the impetus, police reform would help everyone.

Same thing here. They didn't help to effect social change that only helped black people, they helped to effect social change that helped us all.

And they did much more than that.

Sorry for the listicle but it's a good one with decent detail.

https://atlantablackstar.com/2015/03/26/8-black-panther-party-programs-that-were-more-empowering-than-federal-government-programs/

Also:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Panther_Party#Connections_to_the_Gay_Liberation_Movement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Panther_Party#Women_and_womanism

And best of all, they got Republicans and the NRA to support gun control! (pick your jaw up - it was for all the wrong reasons, of course)

https://www.history.com/news/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act

Edit: When I share this kind of information, the fact that some people are bothered enough to downvote it makes me even happier that I shared it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If white racists cared about white lives, then the fact that police shoot white people too should mean double the reason to abolish the police for them. But white racists don't care about white lives. They only care about black lives; ending them. "All Lives Matter" may be true, but it's a lie from the people who say it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Every peaceful rights movement has a less-than-peaceful counterpart that's willing to go just a little bit farther for rights.

Yet the peaceful ones are the only ones who get credit. Why do you think that is?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Look up COINTEL PRO before you accuse the black panthers of being problematic

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I hope you didn't think I was accusing the Black Panthers of anything!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

I read your comment as insinuating only peaceful movements are successful, but I now realise there is another meaning to it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

The Black Panthers were heroes. Armed minorities are harder to oppress, and they make ALL of us harder to oppress.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Karl Marx was a big advocate of worker rights too, not a fan of child labour or dangerous workplaces.

I raise this as the The Black Panthers were a Maoist organisation, and Maoism has a big focus on community improvement (they assume Capitalists aren't about to help you, so you have to organise politically and collectively).