At least in Europe the year after the copyright statement has no meaning, and even the copyright statement itself is useless. Since if not stated otherwise, no rights are granted by default.
Programmer Humor
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
Indeed. Yet every webpage ever has an outdated copyright year.
[checks personal website]
Yes, shame on them!
I thought everyone does <?php echo date("Y"); ?>
No no, we do
time_t t = time(NULL);
struct tm tm = *localtime(&t);
tm.tm_year + 1900;
Everyone writes their web server in plain C, right?
The cool thing to do now is to write it in Rust, only using the standard library.
And I hate it. Nice concept, but I don't like neither, the language nor compiler.
It’s a very different vibe. I remember my first seg fault in C - kids days are missing out!
It's okay to be wrong
- The C compiler, when I parse a &(float) as (long) (it's actually an evil floating point hack to run Quake III on an X86_64 CPU emulated in Scratch running on Spotifys Car Thing) (This would never be possible in Rust)
std::mem::transmute
Yes, but
- it's unsafe, therefore not really Rust I'd argue
- it doesn't look as good
float Q_rsqrt(float number) {
long i;
float x2, y;
const float threehalfs = 1.5F;
x2 = number * 0.5F;
y = number;
i = * ( long * ) &y;
i = 0x5f3759df - ( i >> 1 );
y = * ( float * ) &i;
y = y * ( threehalfs - ( x2 * y * y ) );
return y;
}
Please don't tell me you, unironically, actually use the Carmack rsqrt function in the year of our Linux Desktop 2024.
Also if you like, you can write unsafe Rust in safe Rust instead.
No. But somebody may be.
Well, everyone who’s coding their websites is, yeah. Seeing how almost 10% of all websites use Elementor now and are built by people without an understanding of coding concepts, there are probably plenty of websites that don’t output their copyright year dynamically.
Elementor has this feature, though.
Also:
they: you can find the solution for your problem here
clicks on the 'here' link
404
This happened at my work with internal docs as we switched from an ancient intranet to a new service that had a ton more features but no backwards compatibility so all the pages got updated to PDFs with helpful links that went nowhere and it caused chaos for like 3 months.
When they don't update it, im legally allowed to go into the inspect elements and copy all the code.
view-source:https://url
for easy copying.
Tangentially related, I remember at one of my jobs being tasked (several years in a row) with updating the copyright year in all our source files' headers.
it's probably a red flag if your website can't do currentYear() in the footer.
that's actually an anti-pattern. the purpose if a copyright notice is not to declare the current year to each visitor, fyi.
Yes, it's actually to notify people who aren't part of countries with membership to the WTO of the first available year of public declaration of distribution without restriction, however, putting "1997" on your website makes it look old so people put current year to make it look new.
It's only legally distinct in Aruba, Eritrea, Kiribati, Micronesia, North Korea etc... so it's almost entirely useless.
I meant it's a red flag if someone can't spin up the code and is making an intern change it by hand every year.
Or have a single general footer that they all refer to.
Well it wasn't a website, for what it's worth.
that's where date('Y')
comes in
Year of the tiddies
I read this as boobs.
Is that your date?