cheddar

But starting this weekend, the account shifted its approach dramatically, as first flagged by a social media user on X.

Instead of posting "photos" of leaping dolphins and sandy beaches, the account suddenly started publishing images of flooded mountain neighborhoods, submerged houses, and dogs sitting on top of roofs.

But instead of spreading vital information to those affected by the natural disaster, or at the very least sharing real photos of the destruction, the account is seemingly trying to use AI to cash in on all the attention the hurricane has been getting.

They need an editor.

What's wrong with this picture? https://futurism.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwordpress-assets.futurism.com%2F2024%2F10%2Fhurricane-scammy-ai-slop.jpg&w=2048&q=75

If you want to write edgy replies, you have to expect some downvotes. I think that attempts to normalize toxicity and trolling online are absolutely terrible. I know I have to accept that some people are provocateurs, but I don't have to accept excuses for their poor behavior.

You didn't get any replies yet you decided to edit your comment to argue with an imaginary opponent. Mate, take a breath.

My score is lower.

Users will test, don't waste your energy.

The crazy part that the bank uses username+password method for authentication.

Free or not, monopolies should be regulated.

I somewhat doubt that a company counts illegal viewers and charges more for ads because of them. So the actual broadcaster probably gets nothing.

But the job of a software developer is not to write good code, it is to deliver features. People have been writing bad code without any AI for decades. Businesses often prioritize speed over quality, rewarding teams that deliver features quicker.

You didn't answer the question. Your behavior is toxic.

Wow, that's big. Thank you for the clarification.