this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45619 readers
1869 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The photo of the USA Lenin statue isn't accurate. It resides in the Fremont neighborhood in Seattle, where it frequently has its hands and body splashed with red paint to represent the blood on Lenin's hands.

Just do an image search for it or check it out on google maps streetview.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

France never experienced communism?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ackshully...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lenin himself wasn't the problem and the Statures for him are usually for being a Revolutionary and removing the Tzar.

Stalin was the actual problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lenin was a counterrevolutionary that brutally suppressed any dissent and directly placed Stalin (being well aware of what a person he was) in a position that would make his later takeover possible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lenin did not place Stalin, stalin took over. Other than that, yes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lenin placed Stalin as an enforcer to do the dirty stuff for him. It would be very naive to assume Lenin didn't know the risk involved of putting a former mob gangster in such a position.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

None of the lower countries had communism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can argue if they had sunshine scenario communism all day, but they certainly was under the oppressive thumb of USSR.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I didn't say anything about communism being good or bad there, just that none of those countries ever lived under communism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Technically correct. They were under Stalins Marxism-Leninism, which was supposed to be a placeholder until true communism could be implemented.

But it's a bit disingenuous to split that hair in this thread. The irony being that the latter are all countries that got to experience the kind of gouvernemental structure that Lenin facilitated.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're showing statues of Lenin in countries in which the Dictatorship of the Proletariat failed to cede power to the working class and establish a socialist economic structure.

When Lenin took power, Russia had nothing. It was in the middle of WW1, there were regular famines, almost everyone was illiterate, and it was in no condition to establish a socialist economic plan. So, Lenin created a temporary economic model called The Dictatorship of the Proletariat. This is a centrally planned economy designed to rapidly develop infrastructure and industry in a country that has none. Lenin was already ceding power to the worker's councils when he died. Stalin decided he liked The Dictatorship of the Proletariat and did not cede power back to the worker's councils.

Those countries never experienced Communism. They never even experienced socialism. They destroyed those statues because they hated The Dictatorship of the Proletariat. Living in a system designed for a short temporary economic boom for decades is no fun.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So-called "dictatorship of proletariat" was simply a terror. Lots of philosophers and religious elite was killed just because they weren't compatible with communist ideology. Rich peasants who didn't even use others labor were either robbed or killed. Peasants lost their land and had to work for the country. People got killed just because some anonyms told they did something bad. I know this because it happened to my ancestors. My grand-grandfather lost his house, communists left only one room for his family. His friends, all good people, dissapeared. His daughters never played with neighbor's kids because of fear. My other grand-grandfather lost land and two horses. His brother was killed for not agreeing to give away his house. And my another grand-grandfather was killed because an anonymous letter. He was communist and thought he was safe as he did nothing wrong. His kids couldn't get education because they were "children of the enemy of the people". Much later my grandfather got a paper concluding that execution of his father was a mistake. It was horrible time, and lots of people thought the ones who were killed were "pests" or "enemies of the people", so killing them was good and beneficial for the society.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

countries in which the Dictatorship of the Proletariat failed to cede power to the working class and establish a socialist economic structure

Oh, so like every single other place that tried to implement that deranged system? Thank you for this very important distinction.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about all these capitalist places that fell into fascism? What about the successful capitalist states that are currently falling into fascism?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about them? The choices here are not "what we have now" vs "trust the people that want to try communism again"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My point is about the flawed argument : "communism is bad because the attempts have failed". Well, there are more capitalist attempts that failed than communist ones, so the argument doesn't hold.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My argument is not "look how many attempts have failed" but "look, of all of these many attempts, every single one has turned into a kafkaesque nightmare". At this point it is not even clear that "successful communism" is something that can exist in our world

On the other hand, while many (depending on your perspective you might even say most) capitalist systems fail, there are absolutely some that work ok. Of course nothing is perfect in the real world. But the life of say a danish person is not only materially well off, but also free and full of dignity, which was true of none of the experiments in communism

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure many Chinese are well off, free and full of dignity.

It's also easier to be a successful country when you're not under ambargo just because you're not sold to capitalist companies. Did the US left even one communist country live normally?

But more importantly, how many successful capitalist countries, today, aren't going fascist at full speed?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, countries run by fascists hate communism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Russia seems fine with it though

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So are we discussing countries were fascists live in or run by fascists? Because Russia is 100% the latter

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You used so many words to tell us you don't know what fascism is. Another victim of western education system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More like, another victim of living next to Russia

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plenty of people live next to Russia just fine last I checked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah Ukraine that's full of actual fascists who did a coup in 2014, and are now getting used by the west in a proxy war to weaken Russia as Loyd Austin so honestly admitted. Maybe the lesson there is not to let your country be used as a western proxy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Guess that makes me an actual fascist for trying to live my life not genocided by neighbouring country

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Russia is a partially neoliberal bourgeois democracy(aka dictatorship of the bourgeoisie) they do stuff like invade Ukraine/Iraq/Afghanistan while being distinct enough from fascism that it is more accurate to just call them neolibs

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Wtf I love capitalism now

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Hmm, why do these fascist anti-communist regimes that the US propped up hate Lenin?