this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
134 points (98.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54609 readers
431 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Gitlab seem to be terrible for rolling over for corps.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, Gitlab take down the repo without notice. Github even gave the warning letter first before take down the repo

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If it's a DMCA takedown notice, both GitHub and GitLab are required to take it down. There is no real agency on the part of the hosting site.

It's up to the uploader to counterclaim and enable the host to make the content accessible again.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

We can see a lot from Suyu cases that also on Gitlab it just DMCAd without warning to the maintainer compared to uyouplus and saikou that hosted on Github with proper warning message. So, users have a brief time to fork it or download the latest version. So, Github is much more humane.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think you're confused. There is no warning letter, that's just the takedown notice sent at the same time as the takedown.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

.. and corps are never your friend.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well your corp don't dance and if it don't dance then it's no friend of mine

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Everything's out of control and the corps are doing it from pole to pole.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We need a GitTorrent protocol with DHT. All forks could be one repository, and the identical code shared between them can be cross-seeded.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Finally a use for block chain tech.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I’m not super familiar with it but basically that would mean each code base would be an immutable chain, and all edits get appended? Seems like that would be very compatible with torrent seeding, just need to handle the branches. A branching blockchain, is that a block tree?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm being a little silly. Blockchain stuff wouldn't work great for hosting git on for a number of reasons. You might be onto something with that idea about integrating it with gir and torrents, though. I was thinking of using it as an external way to verify the repo is the real thing and hasn't been tampered with but your idea may be a better version of that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Host it somewhere the DMCA doesn't apply

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It can but they have to go through the effort to actually follow through with the end goal. It's not just an easy automated bureaucratic process to keep stupid safe harbor provisions (that's why copyright claims are so abusable).

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So they took down a list of URI and some JavaScript references? On what grounds?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

On the grounds that the dmca is a blank check to let big corporations do whatever the fuck they want. It doesn't have to be legal, but if you don't take whatever they want down then that's illegal and could get you (GitHub, in this case) in serious trouble.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

I haven't gone into detail on this, but I suspect some shiny-suited, greasy-haired wanker lawyer has been able to make a case that things like site-specific CSS classes and the like can somehow be covered by DMCA.

I'm 100% speculating (not American, not a lawyer) but it's more than URIs and Javascript, is what I'm saying.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is self hosting it with Forgejo over Tor an idea?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Perhaps https://radicle.xyz/

I was just looking at that today due to the increase in repo takedowns lately.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Does this affect the Firefox version? I only see discussion around the Chrome extension so far.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That is the pre-forked version, which doesn't have nearly as much support as Magnolia's version.

The pre-forked version's code is still on GitHub, but the last commit was 6 months ago.

https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome

Here's a bit of history of the forks (unfortunately the conversation was on GitLab, so this is an archive).

https://archive.is/E51cY

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Got it. Well, it works and is much easier to install.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Most of the time, if you disable javascript, it may work or if you use the archive.is site, I think it's called, then it works.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Thanks for the share - have grabbed the latest Firefox repo for my private Forgejo.