winterayars

Got any recommendations?

It's following the Amazon monopolization model.

I don't want to encourage paranoia here but "off" does not mean "off". Modern phones are almost never actually "powered down". If you're paranoid, turning your phone off is not enough. Leave it behind.

(Also a gap in your phone's location history can also be used against you, fwiw.)

"The fourth amendment means what we say it means" -- SCOTUS, probably.

It doesn't mean that in this case, except perhaps very indirectly.

Vaultwarden is Bitwarden--at least for now, this change may push them apart.

No, technically they already are SaaS company. That's mostly how they make their money.

Also it should be noted "no longer open source" doesn't mean they've done a "our code is now closed and all your passwords are ours" rug pull like some other corporations. This is a technical concern with the license and it no longer meets proper FOSS standards (in other words, it has a restriction on it now that you wouldn't see in, for example, the GPL).

So by and large the change is very minimal, the code is still available, it's still the best option. However, this does matter. It may be a sign of the company changing directions. It's something they should get pushback about.

Honestly, it's Bitwarden right now. This move signals their intent to change that, though.

I don't know about state funded, but corporations really, really hate IA for a lot of reasons.

Then why doesn't Nintendo do it themselves?

It's funny how git was carefully designed to be decentralized and resistant to failure from any single node... and we immediately put all our fault tolerance on the back of one corporate-owned entity. Welp.

It's 507 paragraphs long and written in a mix of German and Esperanto but yeah, it's right there! Clear as day!