If you can, run the Archive Team Warrior app on your computer. Help download and archive content!
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
Remember that archive team is unaffiliated with archive.org.
You should still donate to support the storage & maintenance costs of archive.org
Well shit, TIL!
Does anyone know how light the Docker is? Will it stress out an underpowered device like a low end, but not ancient, Synology?
It's no different than running the app directly, performance wise. It does use more disk storage because the docker image is packaged with everything it needs to run instead of relying on your OS libraries.
As far as I can tell it’s always a VM or a Docker VM.
I'm not getting vice as a project on it :/
It's been brought up before but it's worth remembering -
Depending on waybackmachine is fine for now, but a single point of failure to lose everything isn't much better than no backup at all. Always back up locally, to multiple mediums, and use your remote backups as a last resort.
Probably the wrong place to ask, but does archive.org backup everything multiple times? The amount they have saved is absolutely nuts. They depend on donations and i just wonder if content they have had for awhile is still backed up to newer harddrives after a few years?
It says they duplicate and backup all files at various locations: https://help.archive.org/help/archive-org-information/
Probably but I think the point they were making was more along the lines of: what if the Internet archive itself ran out of money or closed up.
I'm afraid of the answer to this question tbh.
Bonus points for the donation link in the OP. Take the rest of the day off!
Hoping they will archive the videos as well!
I'll be donating, again, to this fantastic public service!
Answer after just reading the title. The great cloud in the sky. LOL.
I believe no matter how bad the articles are they are still worth preserving, as we can learn from the mistakes in them
There's nothing on Gawker worth saving let alone worthy of being called news.
Probably the same place Machinema's entire catelogue went.
Vice articles are one of two things:
- Technologically-ignorant #ifuckinglovescience articles written by "tech journalists"
- "Drugs are good, mmkay"
Is there really a shortage of these on the internet?
I did quite like the London Rental Opportunity of the Week column. Somebody should archive that at least.