this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
207 points (94.0% liked)

Memes

45560 readers
1681 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm new to tailwind, what's wrong with it compared to SASS, LESS, SCSS ?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm not sure it compares to things like scss does it? I was under the impression it fills out a similar role to bootstrap and the like

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I think it was an attempt at a joke... basically that the user introduces a faulty juxtaposition that doesn't make sense. One is a CSS framework specifically tailored to SPA's (or heaven forbid MPA's) by providing many generic classes that can be re-used, where as the other 3 are CSS pre-processors designed to simplify writing CSS, though technically speaking tailwind also does pre-processing, since it provides a boilerplate css reset, use of variables, functions, concatenation and compressing them together and oh god I'm the joke... I'm the joke here. I've served the punchline, which is a copypasta in of itself.

Well done, @[email protected]. Well done.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I admire your dedication to the bit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

That's what people always say about my life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Very good explanation... Thank you...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

It bridges the gap between styling languages and frameworks. You use it for any styling, and it brings colour palettes, spacing etc.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Imagine still using Tailwind when things like UnoCSS exists

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

We've found the cs major with no work experience :).

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

literally nobody cares how you feel about the evolving usage of english goes...
btw, the original meaning of "literally" was the same as figuratively... literally as in literature... i.e. fictional, metaphorical...

should we freeze English right now and refuse all new definitions of words? or just accept that it's a living language that changes with its speakers?