this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
179 points (96.9% liked)

Selfhosted

40006 readers
575 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

20240206_210901

All Metal too! I don't have a use for them right now but I'm sure I'll find out something! (I have 14 of them...)

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 90 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I don't have a use for them

Not having a use for extra storage. Wow.
Anyway: [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago (2 children)

glances at their 32TB NAS

No I'm not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Those are puny mortal numbers.... my backup nas is more than twice that.......

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Trust me, I'd have more, but my wife would kill me for spending $3k on hard drives

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

It's not very efficient to have an array of 2TB drives versus a single 16TB drive for example. That's a lot of extra required power and ports for little gain under home use.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

I'm not in the need of really fast storage... normal spinning rust storage, I have plenty of!

[–] [email protected] 43 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Hey it’s me, your cousin…

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My family might grow exponantially with all the cousin ahah

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Yeah, it's crazy how many cousins WE have . . .

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Niko, is that you? Wanna go bowling.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Nah sorry Roman, I gotta take Michelle out today

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
NAS Network-Attached Storage
RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks for mass storage
SATA Serial AT Attachment interface for mass storage
SSD Solid State Drive mass storage

4 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 15 acronyms.

[Thread #494 for this sub, first seen 6th Feb 2024, 21:15] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

With the SATA acronym it seems to have trouble resolving the AT, so I became curious. Here's what I've found:

"AT" was IBM's abbreviation for "Advanced Technology"; thus, many companies and organizations indicate SATA is an abbreviation of "Serial Advanced Technology Attachment". However, the ATA specifications simply use the name "AT Attachment", to avoid possible trademark issues with IBM.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Also, SAS -> Serial Attached SCSI

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I’d always get industrial or enterprise hardware. It’s just better.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's also significantly more expensive 😭

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Secondhand stuff can be really cheap if you know where to look, but the drawbacks are usually power and noise.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Especially for hard drives. 8TB SAS drives are down to about $45 a piece.

Brand new enterprise-grade 8TB drives are more around $180 new. Meaning as long as you have redundancy (which you should anyway) then you can lose four used drives before it stops being worth it. Not to mention drives get cheaper so if your $45 drive dies 2 years from now you could probably replace it for $35 etc.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What's a good, reputable source for those cheap 8TB drives?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

Ah, you found the flaw in this plan.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Just buy them on eBay. Why does it matter where they come from? Again, four of them have to die before it's no longer worth it. It's extremely unlikely you'd be that unlucky.

Personally I have 15 drives in my NAS, all of them were bought used and they've been running 24/7 for 4+ years without issue. Originally I expected to lose at least one per year but they just keep chugging along. All of them have at least 40k power on hours, with the oldest 3TB ones having over 80k (9+ years)

I use unRAID so if/when one does die it's as simple as pulling out the dead one, popping in a new one, and letting it rebuild itself.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

12 drives here all from eBay running same as you for 2 years not a single problem. Hard drives are stubborn bastards when they want to be.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

Where I live, for 45€ you get 800GB, not 8TB :').

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Except when it comes to SSDs.

Under some work loads they just get chewed to bits long before they are obsolete.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Indeed it is.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There are companies that sell parts from used servers, e.g. SAS controllers for PCI.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Well, I have servers that takes SAS drives so I don't need this kind of hardware for the moment!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are they cheaper or more expensive than the high density consumer SSDs?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

usually more expensive per tb, but for a data center not that much because you can get more storage in a single rack than you otherwise would with peasant 8 tb ssds.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No use for them you say 🤔

I was actually just looking at buying some sas spinning drives for a nas. Found a seller on Amazon thats unfortunately gone before i could buy em but it was a pretty good deal. Where do you buy yours from?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I got them for free from the place I work at! I might not be paid a lot, but things like this makes up for it.

SAS drives are often thrown away because they aren't worth a lot (if you don't mind used drives), maybe you can find a lot of good deals there, and since they are cheaper you can always get some spare drives, with a RAID 5 setup it's kinda good

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I might not be paid a lot, but things like this makes up for it.

Really? Being given stuff you don't have a need or use for is good compensation to you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Well, I will surely have a need for them in the future, just need to find it!

And good compensation maybe not but it's better than nother else at all, especially since I've got lot of spinning drives that I'm using on my servers for free. Just replaced 24x 600GB with 24x1.2TB which is not bad for free storage I think

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Damn thats cool! My work doesnt let me take drives old drives. Though we dont use sas drives so that might be why.

I certainly dont mind used drives for mass storage. I was planning to do some kinda raid anyways.

I haven't gotten any kind of nas setup yet. Trying to avoid buying too much lol but good to know other folks are using sas drives too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well, SAS or SATA, it doesn't matter for companies... Except if they keep it for spare, they just don't want to be bothered to delete all the data on them. All drives I got was erased before I got them, some people just don't want to see them go to e-waste, others don't care...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Fair point. My company keeps drives that get taken out of servers for office use. After that theyre recycled.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

The board interconnectors are gorgeous, I love the simplicity.