A pokemon game with low artistic standards? It can't be!
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
Fans keep buying the latest Pokémon games, which is why they'll never get an actually good Pokémon game.
“Fans”? How many? This is an article about someone doing something, with only a hint of significance.
Why would I care if the used computer generated art?
People care because it means that Niantic did not pay an artist to create the image.
We going to do an article every time someone uses a loom to make clothing?
The issue is that art currently relies on the whims of people who control the money.
We need a new socioeconomic system with a more fair wealth distribution, so common people can afford choose to support artists that they want to support.
I agree, but also I don't see the harm in reporting on how corporations using AI is hurting artists or writers.
Adobe has added AI tools to Photoshop.
Just because someone used AI to initially generate a background or some objects does not mean that the entire image was created without an artist.
The artist can always come in and finish off the image, and there are additional tools that let you control characters/poses for the initial AI Generation.
Tbh, if I worked as a webpage artist in Pokemon GO I think I'd do the same. It comes with the ethos of the company.
Gross
I thought the same thing about the latest Spider-Man movie, but it is not AI apparently. It is getting hard to tell.