this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
195 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59123 readers
4873 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Steam has now officially stopped supporting Windows 7, Windows 8, and Windows 8.1.::95.57 percent of surveyed Steam users are already on Windows 10 and 11, with nearly 2 percent of the remainder on Linux and 1.5 percent on Mac — so we may be talking about fewer than 1 percent of users on these older Windows builds. Older versions of MacOS will also lose support on February 15th, just a month and a half from now. Correction: It's macOS 10.13 and 10.14 that are losing support. Not macOS period.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Lmao i only knew they could stop supporting windows 7, people uae more windows 7 than windows 8

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Windows 8.1 was a major update that undid a lot of UI updates that people didn't like after 7

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The un-fucking of Windows 8 release

It actually was a pretty useable OS most of the time

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Yup, it was a very solid OS. It’s similar to how people remember XP, but what they really remember is XP Service Pack 2 which was the rock solid version.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The fix for the god awful TileOS decision.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I didn't conceptually hate the UI there was just so much room for improvement in implementation, if I recall correctly. I was only using a Windows machine for a short time during that era though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

That's why the Win10 start menu was better.
Tiles where it's appropiate and you could even nake the start full screen to top it of.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

How's the experience, overall? I love the Steam Deck OS UI, so I'm thinking of building an AMD machine to run Chimera OS. I've heard nothing but problems when it comes to Windows 11.

I don't intend on playing competitive shooters, so idc about kernel anticheat keeping me out of Call of Duty or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I play exclusively on Linux. Almost every game I tried worked flawlessly. The very few that didn't, crashed on startup or a few minutes after. If you don't play AAA online games with anticheat then you should be good. As a rule of thumb, if it works on the Deck then it will work on any Linux distro.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Hell yeah! I've only experienced a few crashes on SD, and so far only on 2 emulated games that I'm okay with just not playing. I love that Valve started really investing in Linux support to make it possible for idiots like me to have somewhere to turn when Microsoft phones it in.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you are using steam, there's protondb, where you can check how well game runs on linux

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I appreciate the link, but I was more asking about the general experience than about game compatibility. I have a Steam Deck and am enjoying the game functionality, and I haven't hit too many snags in general PC usage on it yet in desktop mode (but I've barely used it for that). I'm really just asking around as a medium level Windows user about fully replacing my Windows laptop with a Chimera build to see what concessions I'll need to accept to have realistic expectations. I'm optimistic that frustrations will be mostly at the "dang it, oh well" level which I could either live with or find a layman level solution to kinda fix. So far, the only real concern I've found with my plan to build a modern Chimera steam machine is that the parts I want will cost me like $1500, and that's pretty hard to justify when I already have a Steam Deck, PS5, and a 2015 Windows 10 laptop. It's another expensive device that kinda just does what my current shit can already do, just all in one rig. If my laptop or PS5 died, I'd have a lot more reason to go for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Maybe the opinion of someone who switched recently would be more useful to you. I'm probably a little biased since I've been exclusively running linux for almost 20 years now

and a 2015 Windows 10 laptop

It's very easy to create a bootable USB stick to just try it out and, if you have enough hard disk to spare and your experience is fine, make it dual boot. This way you can assess if it works for you or not

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If you already have a Steam Deck, then you are basically already familiar with Linux gaming. The software-side of things (Steam, Proton, etc) is going to be the same on desktop Linux.

If a game is compatible with the Deck, then it is also comaptible with desktop.

I've been a Linux gamer for about a decade now. I stick with single player games, so I generally don't have any issues, other than a minor tweak or DLL override I sometimes have to do, but that's no different than trying to run older games on Windows.

Only real issue would be installing mods, which is possible, but could require some extra work, such as manually setting DLL overrides. I've had trouble getting Reloaded II to work in Linux, for example, even though they claim they support Linux.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Translating into Linux terms, Steam has dropped support for:

  • Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Hardy Heron
  • Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolian
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

This is the sole reason my gaming rig is now running on Ubuntu. I have never had Linux on my personal computer before but since I was forced to update the OS anyway, I thought might aswell give Linux a shot.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No big. Just run everything in compatibility mode and pick Windows 10 or 11.

/s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Pro tip, set it to Windows 12 so you don't have to worry for another decade or more

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (6 children)

8 and 8.1 is a shame. Best versions if Windows we've ever had.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Your post would do well in "unpopular opinion".

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

To be fair, W8.1 wasn't that bad, you could even change the full screen start menu to a regular one. W10 was better though. W11 is... well they fixed the most glaring issues over the last year but I still can't get over the crippled start menu.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I was done with Windows when the spying and built in advertising. Poor design decisions are one thing, but untrustworthy untoward actions to the user are another. The last shred of trustworthiness Micro$oft had in my eyes was was being mostly straight in Windows instead of the shady and underhanded shit. We should've seen it coming when they started offering free upgrades

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

The "modern" (aka metro) interface was possibly good on a phone or tablet. Arguably even possibly on a touch screen laptop (not for me though). However it had no business being on a mouse driven computer or even worse a server operating system (Windows 2012).

Even the idea for "metro" apps was horrible. Full screen only. The whole reason the OS is called windows is because you could have two "windows" with two different applications on screen at a single time.

MS could have still included the metro interface if they still shipped the classic Start menu as an opt-in. Yes, its the first thing 90% of users would opt-in to, but at least it wouldn't have had Windows 8 be a rotten footnote in the history of computing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

but I still can’t get over the crippled start menu

You know you can set it back to “legacy”, right? I’ve been using Win11 since it was beta and when you swap the new default gui elements back to “legacy”, it’s much better than even win 10.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Are/were you a big fan of Vista and ME as well?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Vista wasn't actually a bad OS, it just got a bad reputation pretty fast because it had higher hardware requirements than XP and most people didn't have decent enough hardware for a smooth experience. That in combination with the new UAC feature that most people thought was annoying drove people away pretty fast, although the OS itself wasn't bad - in fact, it's pretty similar to Windows 7.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I've used windows from prior to 3 (when it was more of a shell to navigate DOS apps) to 3.11, 95, 98, 98 SE, ME, XP, XP SP2, Vista, 7, 8, and 10 (and probably NT via school). The only ones I'd describe as awful are the < 3 version (mostly because I was already using 95 at the time), 95 (unstable mess), ME (even more unstable mess), and 8 (UI screamed "we need to make our OS more appealing for the tablet market"). Vista might be the one I spent the most time on, now that I think of it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

LOL wasn't ME sorry of a bolt on to 98? IIRC that was the most unstable version of Windows I had ever used. It actually forced me to explore Linux as a desktop seriously for the first time (and shit was jacked in 98-00). I seriously used NT4 as a desktop because it was the most stable version of Windows I could find at the time. Hard time playing games though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I wish I was old enough to have access to install NT on the family compute at the time. My aunt and uncle had ME and it was bad enough that i knew to keep it off my family's machine. Instead I stuck with 98 SE until XP and it gave me an excuse to build a new machine at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It was basically supposed to be one last short-lived DOS based Windows version before Windows switched to an NT base with XP, and in that sense it served its purpose. But although it was a separate product, it was basically '98 second edition in a box. It certainly worked to push people towards jumping to XP a year later, lol. XP is still the best version of Windows MS ever made, IMO. Heard good things about 7, but I was already daily driving Linux by the time 7 was released after Vista bricked itself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I remember using 2k for a long time, after the laughably unstable previews where mice would go crazy. I don't remember exactly what the tool was called, but I was an MCSE back then and had the big binder of MS discs, so I would build my own windows ISOs with a bunch of the built in drivers stripped out and slip stream other packages like Firefox in. Would end up with core installs of only a few hundred MBs. Did the same with XP when it came out, but I started daily driving Ubuntu around 2004 and I left Windows behind for the most part with the exception of work.

I'm sure battery life is still better with Windows, but it's not enough to make me want to go back to it, I'd probably pick up a Mac before that happens.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Worst of both worlds.
Win10 beats it by a mile.
Only way to make the win better would be more privacy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I was helping my grandma with her old laptop that had Windows 8 and let me tell you, I only wanted to punch the screen 4 times!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ow.. and Windows 11 also have stronger hardware requirements, making your laptop not usable in the future if Windows 10 is also deprecated. Causing more and more e-waste ;( just because of software from Microsoft.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Steam would be smart to package their steam deck OS as a dual boot installer for PCs. Boot right into steam when you want to play games.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're eventually going to release SteamOS onto desktop platforms, but for now you can just install Linux.

SteamOS has so many deck and handheld specific features that it's not really a good OS for desktop hardware. HoloISO is something you can install, though, as long as you don't have a Nvidia card, which is just SteamOS packaged in a way that let's it run on other hardware

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

SteamOS has a normal linux desktop, its only in deck mode where everything is deck specific

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, it's just Arch with KDE plasma

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Nobara Project is another good Fedora based build for those wanting to try Linux that will work relatively smoothly for gaming.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Out of curiosity (I no longer run win 7 at all so can't check), does this mean steam will give an error if you try to run it on win 7 and will refuse to run? Or is this just valve saying they are no longer committed to releasing any updates for win 7? Or a combination of the two where they aren't deliberately making it incompatible, but they also aren't deliberately making it compatible so some patch is expected to break it entirely, maybe even today?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Microsoft doesn't even support Windows 7 or 8 anymore, so hardly a surprise. Affected customers can switch to either Windows 10/11 or Linux.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

When no longer supporting Ubuntu 16.04: No big deal, just update, duh...

When no longer supporting Windows 7/8: How dare you!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Gotta wonder how that affects older games that haven't been updated since....

load more comments
view more: next ›