this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
1345 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

60071 readers
3365 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No one can afford a lawsuit that hacky.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Uh, reminder that these giant corporations don't shop for lawyers like you or I would have to, they're already on retainer. It would literally cost them nothing they're not already paying to sue someone (except their reputation, which they've already thrown away).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Right, but you're not talking about Glass Door. You're talking about another cooperation reacting to information on Glass Door. Most companies in the US are small businesses without the resources to go after people on websites in general, and if you're obfuscated your identity before posting on glassdoor, then you just double to tripled the price of the lawsuit in lawyer time filing motions to uncover your identity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You're talking about another cooperation reacting to information on Glass Door.

by wanting to take legal action. They want to transfer liability from Glass Door to the individual. So yes, my point stands...