this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
200 points (90.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26707 readers
1940 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics.


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

LLMs are solving MCAT, the bar test, SAT etc like they're nothing. At this point their performance is super human. However they'll often trip on super simple common sense questions, they'll struggle with creative thinking.

Is this literally proof that standard tests are not a good measure of intelligence?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

When I was at uni lecturers would often state that exams were thr worst measure of grasping the subject material but its all we have at the moment.

It's not all we have...

But it's the only way a professor can run multiple classes of 100 students each.

But colleges are all about profit, so classes sizes are going to be huge.

The goal isn't educating people, it's making money.

So when they say "there's no other option" they're not mentioning the "and keep making as much money" at the end, it's just implied.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm not in the us collages are generally vocational here with both colleges being less (while not totaly) concerned by the money side.

For example where I live university courses are free for those in country outside they pay fees

Dunno how it's done elsewhere but our course are usually measured in 3 parts 1 exam 2 practical 3 essey/investigation. Everyone hates exams

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

It's also the only way that is portable. A professor could evaluate each student, but has no way to transmit that kind of evaluation in a way that schools or employers across the country would trust. They didn't know who the professor is, or what his standards are, or even if he is being bribed to pass somebody. (Which would happen much more if the professors opinion had the weight that the standardized test does. )