https://seattle.eater.com/2024/2/21/24079162/tony-delivers-seattle-delivery-app-fees-downtown
Tony Illes was working as an Uber Eats delivery person when an ordinance passed last year by the Seattle City Council came into effect in mid-January. The new rule required app companies to pay workers like Illes a minimum wage based on the miles they travel and the minutes they spend on the job. The apps say that this amounts to around $26 an hour, and both Uber Eats and DoorDash responded by adding $5 fees to every order (even when the customer is outside Seattle city limits) while calling for the law to be repealed. According to a recent DoorDash blog post, the ordinance has resulted in an “unprecedented drop in order volume,” a drop that Illes felt personally. He told Geekwire that “demand is dead” and told local TV station KIRO 7, “I didn’t get an order for like six hours and I was done.”
So Illes had an idea: Who needs these apps, anyway? He printed up signs with QR codes directing people to a bare-bones website with his phone number, promising that he would deliver food by bike in Uptown, South Lake Union, Belltown, and a chunk of the downtown core for $5 a pop from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. and 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. daily. All you had to do was order the food and send him the screenshot. He called himself “Tony Delivers.”
Many people prefer relative stability with lower average income over freedom.
I understand that, but from my personal experience, this is not more stable because companies like these will fire a chunk of their workforce without batting an eye for the slightest shift in the market, whereas a self-employed person will just see a slight decline in demand. Also, the difference in income more than makes up for the perceived stability. Sure it isn't for everyone, but as a consumer, I'd rather most of the money I pay won't go to corporate executive's multi-million dollar salary, but to the people actually providing the service.
I agree. Just every such order becomes a social interaction until you get used to it.
Which is not bad even for me with my social problems.
The issues are with 1) brand recognition and ads affecting how consumers behave, 2) regulations which may make it hard for individual businesses of this kind in some countries, 3) information exchange.
Yes, it's harder to do this, especially when you're starting out; if I saw such an ad like in the post in my area, I would definitely prefer that over a big corporation even for the same price. The fact that this is significantly cheaper makes it even sweeter, and I would have definitely used this guy's services had I lived in Seattle.
EDIT: it seems you are talking about coop vs hired by corp. Even in relatively sane countries(even not EU) you can have stability in coop
No, in this case I'm talking about individual vs corporate, coop counting as corporate. Yes, with working law enforcement coops work fine and I very much like the idea. Technically I'm part of one even in one part of my life.