this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
116 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59390 readers
2569 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
116
Judge rejects most ChatGPT copyright claims from book authors (arstechnica.com)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Judge rejects most ChatGPT copyright claims from book authors::OpenAI plans to defeat authors' remaining claim at a "later stage" of the case.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So we can use ChatGPT for train others LLM, right?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yes! ....as long as you don't agree to an agreement with OpenAI where you explicitly agree not to use OpenAI services for machine learning/AI.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

  1. Any agreement between OAI and you only binds you, and not people who get the data from you.

  2. This clause may be preempted by copyright law. It's complicated but it may not be possible to use contract law to create an alternative to copyright.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

GPL and BSD and MIT and Apache licenses have entered the room.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

To avoid misunderstandings that some might have. These are copyright licenses. When someone writes something that is the least bit creative, that text is under copyright. A short program/function where the code follows the technical necessities is public domain. Only individual expression gets copyright.

Without a license, you are not allowed to copy or modify a copyrighted text. These permissive licenses allow you to do things which would otherwise be illegal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

But it's fair use !

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Absolutely, and everyone does, but Sam wants you to stop.