Programmer Humor

32396 readers

699 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

920

Junior Dev VS Machine Learning (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

135 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think it's still faster than actual solutions in some cases, I've seen someone train an ML model to animate a cloak in a way that looks realistic based on an existing physics simulation of it and it cut the processing time down to a fraction

I suppose that's more because it's not doing a full physics simulation it's just parroting the cloak-specific physics it observed but still

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I suppose that’s more because it’s not doing a full physics simulation it’s just parroting the cloak-specific physics it observed but still

This. I'm sure to a sufficiently intelligent observer it would still look wrong. You could probably achieve the same thing with a conventional algorithm, it's just that we haven't come up with a way to profitably exploit our limited perception quite as well as the ML does.

In the same vein, one of the big things I'm waiting on is somebody making a NN pixel shader. Even a modest network can achieve a photorealistic look very easily.