this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
667 points (87.9% liked)

Memes

45660 readers
1501 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think AI is neat.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (20 children)

The reason it's dangerous is because there are a significant number of jobs and people out there that do exactly that. Which can be replaced....

[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago (17 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (16 children)

Whilst everything you linked is great research which demonstrates the vast capabilities of LLMs, none of it demonstrates understanding as most humans know it.

This argument always boils down to one's definition of the word "understanding". For me that word implies a degree of consciousness, for others, apparently not.

To quote GPT-4:

LLMs do not truly understand the meaning, context, or implications of the language they generate or process. They are more like sophisticated parrots that mimic human language, rather than intelligent agents that comprehend and communicate with humans. LLMs are impressive and useful tools, but they are not substitutes for human understanding.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You are moving goal posts

"understanding" can be given only when you reach like old age as a human and if you meditated in a cave

That's my definition for it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

No one is moving goalposts, there is just a deeper meaning behind the word "understanding" than perhaps you recognise.

The concept of understanding is poorly defined which is where the confusion arises, but it is definitely not a direct synonym for pattern matching.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)