this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
1755 points (95.5% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1886 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (10 children)

It would be amazing if you could say something coherent about the left without making shit up, lmao

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (9 children)

Feel free to quote and analyse any mistakes I made in detail.

And if you can't: Then you are lying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (8 children)

The bit about the left taking peoples property for no reason and fighting people for not being left of them screams "strawman with no actual points against leftism" to me. You've got this whole "Enlightened Centrist" thing going on that just proves you don't actually want to analyze things and instead just fence-sit because the status quo benefits you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ah, here is something interesting:

The liberal Reichsbanner Movement is going to celebrate 100 years of Resistance to Extremism. They do not differentiate between left and right Extremism. Never did. And their members number in the Millions. That is how you really fight Extremism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Extremism can be correct. The only correct response to racism is antiracism, which is an extremist stance. It's fitting that a liberal party would fight leftist movement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Actually Mao claimed his great leap forward was "Anti-Racism" (and also Anti-Classism and whatever) because he forcefully removed all differences by murdering pretty much any one standing out. Pol Pot never claimed that but technically speaking he was doing the same: Forcefully removing everything making people different. Yes, there is "Extremist Anti-Racism".

Being different is as much a basic right as being treated equally.

An interesting excursus: The Woke movement labelled it "racist" when Non-Rasta-People wore Rasta curls. I on the other hand call it racist to deny people the right to freely chose or reject traditions based on their origin. Because one side is Extremist and the other is liberal. Now tell me where the truth lies.

There is a Bavarian Pro-Verb: Cats enjoy mice, but not me. Again, tell me where the truth lies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're confusing "extremism" with "violence." Pacifism is extremist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No, Pacificm is not always Extremist.

The Green party of Germany is Pacifist.

But they also have been the loudest about rearming the German Bundeswehr in face of Russian Aggression since 2008. I cite their defence speaker from 2010: "Peace is worth fighting for".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Pacifism is an extremist position. Everyone wants to avoid violence, but pacifism is extremist.

You're combining radical, extreme views with violence for no reason other than to lie about having a point. Enlightened Centrism at its peak.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)