this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
603 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59148 readers
2310 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
603
Google search is losing the fight with SEO spam, study says (arstechnica.com)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
125 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I guess we all kinda knew that, but it's always nice to have a study backing your opinions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Kagi (although recent drama leaves me soured)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't fathom paying to have your search history catalogued in correlation to your payment info. This will end as it always does, either hacked or enshittified.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The fundamental difference is that Kagi is making money from having the better product, not from serving more/better ads.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Love Kagi. What happened with recent drama? Must have missed that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Kagi has started using search results from Brave's search index. The LGBT community disapproved of this because of past homophobic actions by Brave's CEO Brendan Eich.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Oh, that. Yeah, I'm not personally worried that they used it very lightly as one of a dozen sources and then stopped.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

The problem was mainly their questionable response

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Fool me once...

Twitter has a similar problem. The more the CEO injects personal politics into the function of the site, the less confidence people have that a new search won't be fucked with. Whatever you might say about Google, Bing, and Yahoo, their owners have at least kept their politics closer to the chest.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago

Thats a terrible reason to not use something that works well though. I mean the founder or CEO of any major bank is probably a shit person with bad takes like racism but does it make their banking service any less useful?