this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
530 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3586 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago (18 children)

I'm just now having to replace my brother printer (HL-2170W) I bought in 06, because the NIC is toast.

The printer still works great, but duplex printing sure would be nice.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (10 children)

If it still has working USB you can hook it up to a $10 raspberry pi with wifi to act as a print server. I can understand if that's a more ambitious tech project than your ready to take on.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There also used to be network printer adapters in the past. For example, the Belkin F8T030 Bluetooth AP. Yes, Bluetooth AP. I'd like something like that just for fun. Perhaps not this one specifically, as it only supports BT-LAP out-of-the-box and requires firmware upgrade for BT-PAN. Good luck finding firmware for a niche product from 2003.

But anyway, perhaps something like that (the printer part) is still made.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The old Apple AirPort Express could turn any USB printer into a networked printer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Absolutely this. Find them online for $10 all day.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)