this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
37 points (95.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26890 readers
1828 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Do you have some methods to mitigate the downsides of search engines and "AI" summarizers? Besides talking to folks online, what other methods might one use to sift through the internet's vast expanses?

Not that I mind the last option, but for any of us to be able to provide each other novel information that we couldn't otherwise search, it seems like there must be some other way to find info that one hasn't produced or compiled themselves.

Edit:
For a more recent & livelier discussion of a similar topic, see this thread.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use SearXNG (specifically search.cronobox.one at the moment, although I've had to switch instances a couple times over the summer), and DuckDuckGo (DDG) Lite in the intermittent periods between when I switch.

SearXNG is a metasearch engine, e.g. it pools together the results from a bunch of sites without giving them your info. You can choose which sites you trust. I usually use DDG, Startpage, Bing, and Qwant, and I block Google (at least directly).

The problem is that once your instance grows too large, the search provider will block it from searching on their site. What ends up happening when all the "big players" catch on is that your results...kinda have a stroke. You start to get random Wikibooks, Wikiquote, and other "weird" results for reasonable queries. This means that it's time to switch.

IMO, this is a reasonable tradeoff for no ads and not giving my info to search providers, save for the initial 24 hours where I haven't overcome the "inertia" to go change my browser to use a different instance and I just end up using DDG Lite for that session. DDG Lite is DDG but without JavaScript.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Isn't including both bing and DDG double-counting? DDG uses Bing for results right?