this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
1024 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

60080 readers
3296 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 52 points 11 months ago (5 children)

The Linux Experiment recently interviewed the CEO who answered this question.

Basically it's the same as anything else. Linux requires more effort to code for due to its variety of distributions, and has a significantly smaller userbase.

In short, don't blame Proton, blame the (lack of) users.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I mean, can’t you just package your app in flatpack or even snap? Bam, your app works on 99% of distributions for little effort. That’s what Spotify does, and I’d argue they have even less incentive to support Linux than proton does

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago

Spoken like someone who has never developed a app package

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

I don't know, I'm not a developer. Lots of companies don't make their products available on Linux, most cite similar reasoning, so it's unsurprising. But I agree it's disappointing. I really wish Linux was more user-friendly.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He also answered this claim, it is right for apps that aren't stuff like Proton VPN that can't work in a sandboxed environment. They are working on it iirc

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Screw VPNs, give us everything else!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well... A drive app will need to access the filesystem pretty in deep to support file syncing, whuch is harder to do on flatpak, their password manager is an extension so on linux too, and for the mail bridge app I think it's already on linux. Those are all the existing proton services

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Sure, as long as you don't need any integration with other software, don't need arbitrary IPC, and actually keep some dependencies in line with some common denominator because there's only so much you can do with static linking (oh excuse me, distributing the shared libraries in the same package as your binaries as if it's a new thing) once it reach the "program must actually run" part.

Flatpack and every other similar solution that are described as "works everywhere" always come with a heck of limitations.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Thunderbird, MegaSync, Bitwarden all distribute as flatpak just fine, and it covers most of the functionality of proton suite.

Ironically the only two services this list doesn't cover: Proton VPN and Proton Bridge, are on flathub...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Last in checked email ain't all that complex, so seems like a good match

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

Variety of distributions doesn't affect the effort in coding, it adds overhead for package management. Only rarely does it require the developer to add some extra code for either an edge case or some specific library requirement.

On top of that, Flatpak and AppImage exist to solve this issue if you don't want to deal with it.

This is a pretty rich statement coming from Proton who has very publicly given out "private" info about its users to law enforcement without even so much as a hint of resistance. I doubt they would want to spend any resources on cross platform if they don't even back up their claim about true privacy.

Even zoom has a lazy script that packages their app in literally every possible format possible because it runs the exact same on every distro. It is not that hard. Literally the only way this doesn't work if you hired some 3rd party MSFT dev to create some insane C++ app with pure Windows API calls instead of using a library.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

That's a bullshit excuse. Looks at Arch's AUR. Look at Gentoo's guru. What happens for proprietary stuff is a deb or rpm package is downloaded, extracted and files copies where they should be. That's it. And it works, because the cornerstone of the system is libc and the kernel. And these, for the overwhelming majority of applications, behave exactly the same on all distros.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think the bigger issue is the variety of distros that end up not being compatible. Even if you overall have a lot of Linux users if they, for the sake of argument, distribute evenly between all distros then it's still a lot of effort to code. The only difference is that the argument will change from "Linux has a small userbase" to "Distribution X has a small userbase".

Linux doesn't just need more users to be worthwhile to develop for, it also needs a distro agnostic solution to run software. That or significantly reducing (or streamlining) the amount of distros so the developers would have far less configurations to account for.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Flatpaks and nix packages work on pretty much every distro.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

That's why I mentioned both 🙂