Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55056 readers

327 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1109

Film studios demand IP addresses of people who discussed piracy on Reddit (arstechnica.com)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

232 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Unless anyone shared the in image link anywhere else on the internet. "Judge, they looked at this publicly accessible image" is hardly evidence

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

“Judge, they looked at this publicly accessible image” is hardly evidence

Sometimes you don't have to win a court case legally, to win a court case. Just the harassment of the lawsuit is enough.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

“Judge, they looked at this publicly accessible image” is hardly evidence
Sometimes you don’t have to win a court case legally, to win a court case. Just the harassment of the lawsuit is enough.

That's not a lawsuit they would even attempt, as it would get immediately thrown out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s not a lawsuit they would even attempt, as it would get immediately thrown out.

People use the threat of lawsuit as an intimidation tactic all the time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So they would send random DMs with pictures, to threaten lawsuits they couldn't enforce, to achieve what exactly?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So they would send random DMs with pictures, to threaten lawsuits they couldn’t enforce, to achieve what exactly?

They wouldn't have to send random DM's if they got the IP addresses more directly, as the article describes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The comment I originally replied to:

They would just have to start DMing us meme images hosted on a server they control, and they’d get a list of IPs. All we’d have to do is look.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm aware. My point still stands.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

They know what torrents people download by IP.

anyone can figure that out: https://iknowwhatyoudownload.com/

Associating IPs with social media accounts is a step towards identifying people so they can threaten them and force them into settlements.

It's a numbers game for the lawyers. They want as much data as they can get to identify the largest number of people so they can demand an out-of-court settlement.

The "DMing pictures" part is just an example of how they could gather that kind of data from a social network like Lemmy that can't be so easily subpoenaed, and allows image hotlinking. I don't have any evidence that they are doing this (yet), I just know that it would work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, but do you publicly share every spam DM image that is shared with you? Would you even know if this happened, so you could react?