this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
-26 points (24.0% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
7834 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Imagine having to work out self driving in 3D traffic though. I guess at least you won't have pedestrians, mostly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Obstacle identification and avoidance, and route planning in a dynamic environment are some of the biggest challenges with autonomous ground cars. In the sky, you don't have bicyclists and delivery truck drivers stopped in the lane, and stuff like that. Even DJI drones can fly around trees and buildings. Again though, it's not that there's no risk, but the problems aren't nearly as difficult to solve.

In cars, you perform SLAM, simultaneous localization and mapping. In the sky, SLAM is way easier.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Aren't other flying cars going to be the dynamic part of the environment? Is what I'm asking

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Sure, but we can expect that they will be communicating with each other in a RemoteID kind of way, but with additional information like up to date location and intended motion vector. Also, air traffic is already divided up into different heights for different directions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah true, I guess if you can enforce that as a standard there's already tons of research on swarming behaviour with drones to work with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

but we can expect that they will be communicating with each other in a RemoteID kind of way

Sure, with 10 competing standards from 10 different companies that don't communicate with each other.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

with 10 competing standards

FAA has authority over every outdoor flying vehicle above ground level. I doubt there will be competing standards. RemoteID has been an awful rollout with a lot of miscommunication, but afaik there was never problems with incompatibility. (I'd actually love to see the standard spec) Airplanes already send out their location, been doing it for years. You can use an SDR to listen in on existing airplane beacons and map them on your computer.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140118233412/http://www.richardosgood.com/blog/2014/01/14/track-airplanes-with-rtl-sdr-and-ads-b

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

It's a good thing that birds aren't real, and already have RemoteID built-in.