Technology

59312 readers

4597 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

945

Moderna’s mRNA cancer vaccine works even better than thought (www.freethink.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

185 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If it cost ten thousand dollars I'd throw an enormous party. That's already a very small price for a cancer treatment.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right? Bunch of morons who never had cancer, or never knew anyone who was diagnosed and treated for cancer, thinking a 10k treatment is expensive.

Communism Stan's be Stanning

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

10k is expensive

Less expensive than now? Yes

Still expensive

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago

That's zero sum thinking.

If it was 10k that is, literally, an order of magnitude cheaper.

You can't have it both ways. The people who I know who have had cancer, and had it treated, the cost has been well over 100k. Some over 200k. That's per time. If it came back it would cost that all over again.

So which is it. Is it evil that a new treatment could cost 90% less? Or should the capitalists do what they do and charge 300k for this better treatment?