this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
849 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
3048 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
849
Substack says it will not remove or demonetize Nazi content (www.theverge.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
420 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

More than 200 Substack authors asked the platform to explain why it’s “platforming and monetizing Nazis,” and now they have an answer straight from co-founder Hamish McKenzie:

I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either—we wish no-one held those views. But some people do hold those and other extreme views. Given that, we don’t think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away—in fact, it makes it worse.

While McKenzie offers no evidence to back these ideas, this tracks with the company’s previous stance on taking a hands-off approach to moderation. In April, Substack CEO Chris Best appeared on the Decoder podcast and refused to answer moderation questions. “We’re not going to get into specific ‘would you or won’t you’ content moderation questions” over the issue of overt racism being published on the platform, Best said. McKenzie followed up later with a similar statement to the one today, saying “we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the context of the post is about knowingly serving nazis. this argument does not work in that context.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also about allowing them to congregate on your platform. Nazi bars aren't just Nazi bars because of who's in them but also because of who is not in them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

yeah this is also a good point

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are also knowingly serving many other categories, so ? They are both democrats and republican, nazis and pro-israel and whatever other "category" uses them to publish artices ?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this argument is implicitly assuming nazism is “on the same level” as being democrat/republican or any other “category”. this is not the case, so this argument also doesn’t work. do you have any others?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't said they are on the same level.
I simply said that if you define a platform as "nazi" because they serve a nazi then you can define the same platform as "whatever" because they serve whatever.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

i can define the color orange by the color of the fruit. i could also define red and blue by the color of that same fruit. not all of these definitions are equally valid