this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
857 points (96.4% liked)

Memes

45894 readers
1413 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
857
6÷2(1+2) (programming.dev)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

https://zeta.one/viral-math/

I wrote a (very long) blog post about those viral math problems and am looking for feedback, especially from people who are not convinced that the problem is ambiguous.

It's about a 30min read so thank you in advance if you really take the time to read it, but I think it's worth it if you joined such discussions in the past, but I'm probably biased because I wrote it :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I don't see the problem actually.

  1. Everything between ()
  2. Exponents
  3. multiply and devision
  4. plus and minus
  5. Always work from left to right.

==========

  1. 1+2= 3

  2. No exponents

    • 6 devised by 2 (whether a fraction or not) is 3
    • 3 times 3 is 9
  3. Nothing remains

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The meme refers to the problem of handling implicit multiplication by juxtaposition.
Depending on what field you're in, implicit multiplication takes priority over explicit multiplication/division (known as strong juxtaposition) rather than what you and a lot of people would assume (known as weak juxtaposition).

With weak juxtaposition you end up 9 just as you did, but with strong juxtaposition you end up with 1 instead.

For most people and most scenarios this doesn't matter, as you'd never encounter such ambiguous equations outside of viral puzzles like this, but it is worth knowing that not all fields agree on how implicit multiplication is handled.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Humans...

Can agree over a universal charging cable, but not over simple math rules...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Truly the dichotomy of man

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The meme refers to the problem of handling implicit multiplication

There's no such thing as implicit multiplication. dotnet.social/@SmartmanApps/110925761375035558

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

I don’t see the problem actually.

Everything between ()

You recreated the problem right there - ignored The Distributive Law. a(b+c)=(ab+ac). i.e. 2(1+2)=(2x1+2x2). After step 1 - solving brackets - all that's left is 6/6. dotnet.social/@SmartmanApps/110819283738912144