this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
518 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

59123 readers
2299 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla Cybertruck's stiff structure, sharp design raise safety concerns - experts::The angular design of Tesla's Cybertruck has safety experts concerned that the electric pickup truck's stiff stainless-steel exoskeleton could hurt pedestrians and cyclists.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Who would buy this piece of crap? Like really?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

Possibly unpopular opinion but I think the Cybertruck is about as dumb-looking as most any other truck on the market. 4 big doors, more cabin than bed, trucks in general are all goofy looking parking lot crawlers nowadays

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Shit on me if you must but I actually like the look and features of the car. However I likely wouldn't buy a Tesla in general

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It could be a good vehicle, if it was built by someone else.

The past few years have revealed that while Tesla have the tech, they lack the basic precision manufacturing that other automakers mastered decades ago.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I agree, features are nice and I also would enjoy trying to drive one. But in a for a long term usage, I bet the reliability will be an issue and also some Tesla shenanigans such as 20k for the battery.

Thing is: I personally don’t give a shit about features. I like simple and basic vehicles that last for many years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

You’d like the “features” of any car, it’s why they’re features. It’s the tradeoffs that actually matter.

And yeah, it looked cool at first, but that’s really just because of its uniqueness. From an actual design perspective, it just looks…stupid.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Fellow narcissists.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I think the main market was supposed to be like a utility vehicle. It's got some nice specs for actual work purposes for an electric vehicle, while saving money by not making a pretty body.

I don't know why some people like the look and want it for recreational use.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It was supposed to be a utility vehicle but it genuinely failed. If I wanted a utility vehicle, I would get Toyota Land cruiser 79. For a utility vehicle, you need something reliable, something which does not have 246 useless electronic features and something you can drive while wearing gloves (you cannot so this with tesla considering every setup is made via the display).

Tbh, to me is seems like a car which is made purely for city and for the ones who just want to show off. It definitely is not a proper workhorse.

If I wanted a utility vehicle (which would be abused), I would look for:

  • big payload
  • 3 pedals
  • hand brake
  • steering wheel
  • 4x4, diff locks , transfer case
  • gear lever

Nothing more is truly needed because it just adds the probability of failure.