this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
38 points (62.0% liked)

Technology

59312 readers
5268 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
38
New GitHub user and extension developer claims Twitch’s website has malware (github.com)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/issues/5184#issuecomment-1829172308

Twitch is a dangerous website, the extension probably won't be back. They could still easily target you at any time and you are just lucky they are sending ads. After some time of using the extension twitch will react and become even more toxic.

Twitch even has a network sniffer in its source code (among other things), its so much worse than just ads, some of these experiments are basically malware/pup that no-one would install on their device willingly, these instances aren't just left over code from some library they are deliberately crafted experiments that are present in the active code path.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

based on the randomly inserted code block that isn't even syntax-correct, to say nothing about how it doesn't even make sense, seems to be a tell tale sign of either 1.) AI generated or 2.) schizophrenic generated

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

hmm, which parts of it aren't syntax correct? see below, they made an extension before pulling it

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

I don't see an issue in these two lines.

The only thing is that they are most likely not actually successive lines (because otherwise that code would be pretty weird).

I think that the point of the code is only to show the function names.