this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
215 points (89.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26701 readers
1827 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics.


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

E.g. abortion rights, anti-LGBTQ, contempt for atheism, Christian nationalism, etc.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I tried to word it as non-biased as possible. How would you word it to make it less biased in your opinion?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

This comment and my other in the thread are gonna get a ton of downvotes, so I’m just going to own it.

Also, this is entirely from my experience with republicans in real life. I am not one, but many of my family and friends are.

First, most are not anti-LGBT at all. Most that I know are against these laws that are being out into place. But these issues are not very important to them so they don’t have strong convictions that would dissuade them from voting based on this issue. They will not engage if you call them anti-LGBT because they are not.

Second, contempt for atheist. This is a perspective that comes from the online and media representation of republicans. I’ve never heard a single discussion about atheists with republicans. This is not an issue, period. They will not engage in discussion around an issue they do not see as an issue.

Third, Christian nationalism is, again, not relevant to these people. They do not see it as real nor do they see it as a real problem. They may engage with this discussion. So I don’t see a need to reword this one.

Lastly, abortion rights. This isn’t how republicans frame the issue. They view it as a human right and ending a human life early. I don’t agree, but they will not engage with someone asking why they are against “abortion rights”.

Again, let me repeat, I voted straight dem ticket last election. I am only giving my perspective based on interactions with real life republicans.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago

Third, Christian nationalism is, again, not relevant to these people. They do not see it as real nor do they see it as a real problem. They may engage with this discussion. So I don’t see a need to reword this one.

The literal current Republican speaker of the House stated outright that the USA is "depraved" and key parts of his reasoning for this was the prominence of LGBT people in modern culture and declining church attendance and religious observation.

I fully agree that your average random Republican doesn't necessarily hate LGBT people, or non-theists but they're simply not paying attention to the outrageous crap many elected representatives are saying.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

Having grown up in the rural deep south, this feels like more of a description of blue state Republicans than red state Republicans.

You can clearly see that plenty of states have Republicans that care about LGBT issues. In Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee, and West Virginia, less than 1/3rd of Republicans think homosexuality should be accepted. And it's not like all the other states are blowing them out of the water. A majority of Republicans/Republican leaners believe gay marriage being legal is somewhat or very bad for society. Less than half believe it is acceptable for gay people to raise children. And that's not even touching trans issues.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Thanks for your response. Much appreciated.

Still, the things you say they don't want to engage in a conversation about or even acknowledge are actual policies the party engages heavily in. And that's really my question. How do they reconcile their non-religious convictions with those religious policies of the party.

Do you mean they just don't care and vote for the party regardless because there's one policy they like?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They honestly seem like any other voter. For me, I don’t agree with every position the dem party takes. They are the same, they simply agree with republicans more the democrats.

At least that’s my take.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the clarification.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I read it as being a matter of phrasing. Which will make rewording potentially difficult. But for instance, you use the phrase "Christian Nationalism" to cover an umbrella of policies you see as related, I think OP is saying that your average republican doesn't identify their policies and opinions as being part of the Christian nationalism umbrella. Since they don't make that association, they don't, maybe even don't know how to, engage under that umbrella.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The one you list lastly seems like the only actual reason. The others are things they DONT care about

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Honestly, this seems like the depiction of a bunch of people that are safe and prosperous and can’t imagine how their views could possibly be problematic, and don’t need to, and so avoid political discussions because it’s just a bit too yuck and they’d prefer to lead their happy lives.

Basically the conservative - privilege coupling that is so shit.