Technology

60052 readers

2966 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

464

Google and major mobile carriers want Europe to regulate Apple's iMessage platform (www.engadget.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

203 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The long fight to make Apple's iMessage compatible with all devices has raged with little to show for it. But Google (de facto leader of the charge) and other mobile operators are now leveraging the European Union's Digital Market Act (DMA), according to the Financial Times. The law, which goes into effect in 2024, requires that "gatekeepers" not favor their own systems or limit third parties from interoperating within them. Gatekeepers are any company that meets specific financial and usage qualifications, including Google's parent company Alphabet, Apple, Samsung and others.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't have to be open, just provide publicly accessible APIs so that apps can interconnect with it. Google provides this, Apple does not.

To be clear IDGAF about Google. I promote RCS and you can say it's not a standard, but it is. It's maintained by the GSM Association and they put out a universal profile that anyone can implement and extend just like Google did and Apple could easily do. They're just extending an existing standard.

Even in the Google messages app I can change the RCS backend servers at any time, you don't have to use Googles RCS implementation

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn’t everyone hate it when google extends APIs? Think it’s called EEE (embrace, extend, extinguish). They have a history of killing standards as soon as they have enough market share.

If you change off of googles servers you lose features. I’d consider that no longer an open platform. So despite not needing to use their implementation, if you want the modern features RCS is often advertised as having, you have to go through google. That’s not an open standard.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The only 2 features I'm aware of the you lose are e2ee and those sticker things, all other modern features in RCS are present in the Universal Profile and there's no reason that e2ee won't come to the Universal Profile in time.

Like I said I'm not enthralled that Google is the one bringing RCS to the US, but I prefer Google over the carriers (Who were supposed to do it in the first place)