this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
2045 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59312 readers
4597 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

U could still easily evade this. Here's why:

Ad is inserted into stream. Either one of two things happens depending upon the way it is implemented:

  1. The length of the video stream increases as the ad is inserted suddenly. The ad blocker can simply calculate the difference and skip the difference worth of time, thus skipping the ad.

  2. The length of the video doesn't increase to prevent this. Thus, you get the ad stream overlapping in front of the actual video stream. This would thus kinda be on the frontend, which could easily be blocked.

  3. The ad is inserted in the beginning itself at some random time in the video. Hence, the length of the video doesn't change suddenly like in scenario one. However, remember that regulations require you to visually indicate that a given piece of media is an ad or not. This is why YouTube ads have "Ad" in a yellow box. This could thus very easily be detected by an adblocker that analyses every frame that the box is present in, and skips that frame. This however, would be a little heavier for the user using the adblocker.

Trust me lol. There is literally no way you can prevent ad blockers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

if the platform decides which and where the ads will run during the video on page load, not during video pIay then I dont see how this could be blocked.

Anither thing they can do is enforce policy and start deleting/banning accounts blocking ads. I have some stuff on google account. Wouldn't be fun to have it deleted.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Since their pop-up already mentioned using AdBlock violating their TOS, I've started using a different Browserprofile with a dedicated Google account which I'll exclusively use for YouTube.

If there will be a slow weekend coming up, I'll set up a self hosted piped instance

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look at point 3. I explained this could still be skipped due to them having to visually indicate that it was an ad. This visual indication could easily be skipped by the local user.

As for them deleting accounts that blocked ads, how would they identify if someone blocked ads? Generate a secret key for every ad, that would be returned every time a user watched ads? This could easily be overcome, as an adblocker could simply extract this key and send it back to the server.

Trust me.... If there was a way to block ad blockers, the greedy capitalists would've done so a loooong time ago.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok I see. Why is Chrome store still having ublock origin there and others? I'd just remove it. But they let it be there for everyone to download.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Ok so this is how I think it works behind the scenes: the actual devs at Google don't give af whether ppl use adblockers or not. I think it's probably just the execs who come across stuff like this and tell the devs to "fix the problem". Look at how Vanced was there for a long time. Only when it started becoming too popular (especially when they released an NFT), did YouTube crack down on it.

The reason why ublock origin is still in the Chrome store is because the execs prolly don't know about it much. Maybe they are afraid that ppl would immediately hop onto Firefox if they did anything stupid like that? I dunno.... However, I'm pretty confident that they're going to do something stupid like banning ad blockers from the Chrome store quite soon. It would be quite hilarious to see the aftermath of that!