this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
22 points (95.8% liked)

Selfhosted

39980 readers
657 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I recently asked about an alternative to Google Drive, and someone mentioned Synology. After some digging, I came across xpenology.

Since I already have an Intel NUC (proxmox), I decided to give it a go and got it successfully setup in a dedicated VM.

Now that Synology looks very powerful, I decided to go with it while also planing to upgrade my current NUC setup from 250GB ssd/750GB HD to 2tb nvme/2tb SSD.

While doing that, I was wondering whether I should keep my current VM (fedora) that runs some docker services like ~~proxmox~~ portainer, reverse-proxy, blocky, etc or whether I should move these to the xpenology VM.

Edit: I just realized, my comment was confusing due to a typo... To clarify: I run proxmox on bare-metal and have two VMs in there, Fedora and xpenology. So in short, is the Fedora VM redundant while having a powerfull synology OS already running?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would also not recommend running essentially a cracked server OS handling maybe your most important files.

If you insist to use some Synology application there is this solution:

https://hub.docker.com/r/vdsm/virtual-dsm

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I tried that... although I had some issues setting it up.

What's funny, I thought this would be the hacky solution, while xpenology being the real deal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are both hacky, but the Docker image is only handling the tasks you want it too, not the whole system, so if it goes haywire it's not as bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

you're right... I'm already evaluating it now.