this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
161 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59440 readers
3633 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Solar and wind energy could fulfill energy demand 10-fold, Oxford study finds::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't the dust in the atmosphere also prevent energy transmission just as it does solar?

Wind, still works

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You'd use frequencies that can penetrate cloud cover in that case, it wouldn't work otherwise because then it would still be subject to weather.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some sort of orbital death beam? I seem to recall a 2000ad story around a space energy beaming facility that goes horribly wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh sure, it sounds extremely dangerous, just like standing too close to a radar will poach your brain. The satellite beaming the energy back would have to stay on target and if it didn't it would need a quick and safe way to shut off. Of course dissipation of excess energy in a ground-based grid is a serious issue, so how you would design a satellite to deal with the sudden stop in energy flow is completely beyond me. Maybe you just write it off and launch another one in that case, and you have a lot of redundant paths rather than one critical one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know for sure but it's particulates that make it a nuclear winter, not just cloud (water) but would also need to penetrate the clouds as well.

It's probably not wise for me to Google "what frequencies of EM can penetrate a nuclear winter clouds" though 🙂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's actually a pretty good point and I don't know how it would work either. It would definitely interfere with the signal to some extent.