this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
2098 points (99.3% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1345 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

old reddit still works. For now.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

this is one of those things like VLC media player, or even just hard drives: it's hard to believe it still exists

it will 100% be removed within the next 5 years.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is it hard to believe VLC or hard drives still exist? HDDs remain the most cost effective way to store large amounts of data and VLC is a widly popular open source media player that is often the default media player on linux systems

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

HDDs are only still around because SSDs are so expensive.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly, ssds are expensive. Hence why it is not hard to believe that hard drives are still popular

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

5 years? Honestly, I give old reddit maybe 1 year left.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just bought 4 hard drives. They are the most cutest effective way of storing data for most people. I'm pretty sure tape is more expensive, if it's not there are other issues like sequentially written data. Anyway, this is a dumb example and I don't expect old reddit to last.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Awwww cute lil hard drives 🥺🥰

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a little theory that the hard drive market will collapse fast once SSDs become 2x the price per GB. My reasoning is that a lot of these setups for large data storage are using four drives on RAID10. With SSDs, those can become just two drives on RAID1 for the sake of redundancy; the speed advantage of adding RAID0 to the mix will be inconsequential. So they can cost twice as much when you're buying half as many.

We're not that far away from this point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Actually I would assume that most people with 3 or more drives are running some form of RAID 5.

With 4 drives and this structure I receive the capacity of 3 drives. The final drive is called the "parity" drive which keeps some kind of copy of the information on it. If one drive fails then I can replace it with a new drive and rebuild the data from parity. This is a long process that requires the data off the parity drive and the other two drives. But you can do this with any disk, from any other three disks.

It's really cool. Sure there are speed benefits but the real kicker is the size of the pool. With current tech I can fairly reasonably get four 18TB drives SSD's have a long way to go before they affordably reach that kind of capacity.